2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Echocardiography before and after Resect-Plicate-Release Surgical Myectomy for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[15][16][17][18][19][20]24,26 Thus, mitral-septal contact was shown by provocation to be inherent to their HCM with latent obstruction, For our 13 patients, high provocable gradients due to SAM, and the morphologic predispositions to SAM of HCM were present temporally remote from the ballooning episode, at a time when the LV systolic function was normal.…”
Section: Variation In Gradient During the Ballooning Admissionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[15][16][17][18][19][20]24,26 Thus, mitral-septal contact was shown by provocation to be inherent to their HCM with latent obstruction, For our 13 patients, high provocable gradients due to SAM, and the morphologic predispositions to SAM of HCM were present temporally remote from the ballooning episode, at a time when the LV systolic function was normal.…”
Section: Variation In Gradient During the Ballooning Admissionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Detailed measurements were made from echocardiograms, during the ballooning episode, and before or after the episode, at a time when LV function was normal. [23][24][25] Papillary muscle and chordal abnormalities position the mitral valve anteriorly in the LV cavity, subjecting it to the drag of ejection flow. We measured segmental LV wall thicknesses from 2D echocardiography as previously reported.…”
Section: Echocardiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the agreement between echocardiography‐ and CMR‐measured lengths is suboptimal (Figure ), and so the non‐interchangeability between techniques represents a drawback we should be aware of when standardizing measurement approach at each center. At this point, it is worth noting that the alternate way to measure anterior MVL length, that is from the anterior MVL tip to the aortic annulus at the insertion point of the noncoronary aortic leaflet, shows similar differences between HCM patients and controls (Table ) with slightly improved inter‐technique agreement and reproducibility (Data : Bland–Altman graph and reproducibility analysis). Therefore, it is reasonable to assume the two ways to measure the anterior leaflet length: method 1, from mitral hinge point to leaflet tip and method 2, from noncoronary aortic cusp insertion to leaflet tip.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This particularly involved the anterior leaflet, with mean values of 25 mm by the method of up to the mitral annulus hinge point 4,5 and 27 mm by the method of up to the aortic noncoronary cusp insertion point. 16,22 This is of paramount importance as leaflet elongation itself makes less effective the papillary muscle capability of leaflet systolic restrain, ). This corresponds to +3% and +12%, respectively, relative to the averaged means of echoand CMR-derived values.…”
Section: Mitral Valvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…В ряде публикаций предлагают в качестве верхней границы нормы использовать критерий 30 мм (в сег-менте A2) или 17 мм/м 2 [23][24][25]. По данным Klue H.G.…”
Section: б) избыточная длина передней створки митрального клапанаunclassified