1981
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.137.3.471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Echogenicity: analysis, significance, and masking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A small fatty myelolipoma may be masked by adjacent echogenic retnoperitoneal fat. Unless displacement of nearby organs is shown, the tumor may be unrecognized [9]. Furthermore, on sonograms, apparent disruption and posterior displacement ofthe diaphnagmatic echoes could be appreciated only when the tumor was larger than 4 cm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small fatty myelolipoma may be masked by adjacent echogenic retnoperitoneal fat. Unless displacement of nearby organs is shown, the tumor may be unrecognized [9]. Furthermore, on sonograms, apparent disruption and posterior displacement ofthe diaphnagmatic echoes could be appreciated only when the tumor was larger than 4 cm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the pancreatic echo intensity increases, it approache s that of the adjacent re troperitoneal, mesente ric, and peripancreatic fat and soft tissues, blending imperceptibly wit h these structures. The blending of areas of increased echogenicity with adjacent normally echogenic structures has been termed by Kurtz et al 20 the "masking sign." It is probable, therefore, that our measurements in patients with cystic fibrosis included some of the surrounding tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there is also fat in the peripancreatic space surrounding the pancreatic head, it is often impossible to separate pancreas from peripancreatic fat since the pancreas has the same echogenicity as its surroundings (Fig. 4) [7]. An enlarged pancreas or a pancreatic mass is therefore simulated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%