2016
DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2015.2464353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

eClims: An Extensible and Dynamic Integration Framework for Biomedical Information Systems

Abstract: Biomedical information systems (BIS) require consideration of three types of variability: data variability induced by new high throughput technologies, schema or model variability induced by large scale studies or new fields of research, and knowledge variability resulting from new discoveries. Beyond data heterogeneity, managing variabilities in the context of BIS requires extensible and dynamic integration process. In this paper, we focus on data and schema variabilities and we propose an integration framewo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…eClims, see Savonnet et al (2016), is another example of an integration framework to deal with data and schema variability in Biomedical Information Systems (BIS). Since Biomedical research area has to deal with the constant integration of increasing number of databases and ontologies, they have created eClims to facilitate the integration of new data and extend data models at the same time assuring quality using Databases and Semantic Web theory.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…eClims, see Savonnet et al (2016), is another example of an integration framework to deal with data and schema variability in Biomedical Information Systems (BIS). Since Biomedical research area has to deal with the constant integration of increasing number of databases and ontologies, they have created eClims to facilitate the integration of new data and extend data models at the same time assuring quality using Databases and Semantic Web theory.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on conceptualization and various levels of generality, ontologies can be classified as application ontology, domain ontology, generic ontology, or representation ontology (Bimba et al, 2016). Application ontologies elicit the necessary characteristics needed to describe the relationship between concepts according to a specific task in a particular domain (Liu, Wang & Wu, 2010;Savonnet, Leclercq, & Naubourg, 2016). Alternatively, domain ontologies represent concepts that are only valid in a particular field.…”
Section: Knowledge Base Modeling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, application ontologies have method and task specific extensions (Jin Tan et al, 2005;Savonnet et al, 2015;Simperl, 2009;Van Heijst et al, 1997). An application ontology describes the relationship between concepts based on specific tasks (Liu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Application Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%