2019
DOI: 10.1042/bsr20182463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ECMO attenuates inflammation response and increases ATPase activity in brain of swine model with cardiac arrest compared with CCPR

Abstract: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) could increase survival rate and neurological outcomes of cardiac arrest (CA) patients compared with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR). Currently, the underlying mechanisms how ECMO improves neurological outcomes of CA patients compared with CCPR have not been revealed. A pig model of CA was established by ventricular fibrillation induction and then underwent CCPR or ECMO. Survival and hemodynamics during the 6 h after return of spontaneous circulation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…48 Additionally, CPB resuscitation is different from manual or mechanical CPR, and while providing consistent and standardised blood flow, the extracorporeal circulation may contribute to the severity of the sepsis-like syndrome commonly observed after cardiac arrest. 49 We used vasoactive agents to reach and maintain the targeted MAP, and these drugs may have effects that could influence the results. The use of noradrenaline to maintain target MAP is recommended in current post-resuscitation guidelines, whereas titrating nitroprusside to MAP60 is not common practiceand may have had unintentional and clinically relevant effects on CBF.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 Additionally, CPB resuscitation is different from manual or mechanical CPR, and while providing consistent and standardised blood flow, the extracorporeal circulation may contribute to the severity of the sepsis-like syndrome commonly observed after cardiac arrest. 49 We used vasoactive agents to reach and maintain the targeted MAP, and these drugs may have effects that could influence the results. The use of noradrenaline to maintain target MAP is recommended in current post-resuscitation guidelines, whereas titrating nitroprusside to MAP60 is not common practiceand may have had unintentional and clinically relevant effects on CBF.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECMO alleviates the neuro-inflammatory response in brain tissue. Zhang et al ( 31 ) in a porcine cardiac arrest model, found that IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α, and TGF-β levels were significantly lower in the ECMO group than in the CCPR group, while the difference in IL-10 levels between the two groups was not statistically significant. Pastuszko et al ( 34 ) investigated the effect of ECMO on pro-inflammatory signaling in the striatum of piglets after CA and found that ECMO significantly reduced pro-inflammatory proteins (IL-12p40, IL-21, IL-15, IL-1α, and β, IL-8, MIP-1β, OPG, PIGF-2, RANTES, and TGF-β).…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Ecmo In Preventing Cerebral Injury Induced By Camentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Zhang et al ( 31 ) found that ECMO could improve ATPase activity compared to CCPR in a porcine model of CA. It has also been found that ECPR treatment of CA in rats has a protective effect on neurons after CA, and the mechanism may be related to improved energy metabolism in the brain ( 32 ).…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Ecmo In Preventing Cerebral Injury Induced By Camentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 An experimental animal study showed that, especially early after initiation of ECPR, cardiac output, and MAP are higher in ECPR than in ROSC after conventional CPR (CCPR). 4 When comparing ECPR with a non-pulsatile blood flow and MAP 40-60 mmHg strategy to ECPR with a pulsatile blood flow and MAP 100-120 mmHg strategy, higher markers of cardiac injury and lower favorable neurological survival were found in the non-pulsatile group. 5 Two meta-analyses and the first randomized controlled trial (RCT) showed higher rates of favorable neurological survival in ECPR than in CCPR-treated patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of these rapid fluctuations in the direct post‐resuscitation phase are unknown 2 . An experimental animal study showed that, especially early after initiation of ECPR, cardiac output, and MAP are higher in ECPR than in ROSC after conventional CPR (CCPR) 4 . When comparing ECPR with a non‐pulsatile blood flow and MAP 40–60 mmHg strategy to ECPR with a pulsatile blood flow and MAP 100–120 mmHg strategy, higher markers of cardiac injury and lower favorable neurological survival were found in the non‐pulsatile group 5 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%