2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eco-innovation determinants in manufacturing SMEs: Systematic review and research directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
114
2
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
8
114
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Knowing that information sources are associated with the technology factor, as in Triguero et al [58], and observing the variables used in this study, they are found to have a significant and positive influence on technology, as demonstrated in the study by Lee et al [66], which, based on open innovation, reveals empirically the positive impact of external sources of information on innovation. Pacheco et al [107] provided a systematic literature review on eco-innovation determinants in manufacturing SMEs, identifying the available resources (e.g., people, technology, and know-how) as the most important determinant factor. This is justified by the fact that eco-innovation requires an investment in qualified human capital, as well as the acquisition of technology or knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowing that information sources are associated with the technology factor, as in Triguero et al [58], and observing the variables used in this study, they are found to have a significant and positive influence on technology, as demonstrated in the study by Lee et al [66], which, based on open innovation, reveals empirically the positive impact of external sources of information on innovation. Pacheco et al [107] provided a systematic literature review on eco-innovation determinants in manufacturing SMEs, identifying the available resources (e.g., people, technology, and know-how) as the most important determinant factor. This is justified by the fact that eco-innovation requires an investment in qualified human capital, as well as the acquisition of technology or knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the methodological rigorousness of reviews of management, Gast et al (2017) followed SLR to consolidate literature in the field of sustainable ecological entrepreneurship and identified drivers of engagement in sustainable entrepreneurship and provided an integrative framework. Pacheco et al (2017) carried out a systematic review of the last 24 years literature to develop a solid knowledge base to help in identifying the determinants of ecological innovation in SMEs and related strategies. Bossle et al (2016) applied SLR for identifying main drivers & motivation for adoption of ecological innovation because of its specificity related to the research question.…”
Section: Methodology Used: Systematic Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, knowledge sharing is found to have a direct and positive association with green innovation processes and a positive impact on the development of eco-innovation by firms [38]. In addition, green innovation processes are alternatives to production and consumption that involve knowledge sharing among partners or employees, green innovation process research and development, and cooperation with suppliers [39]. Therefore, a very strong direct relationship between green innovation processes and eco-innovation is created.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 95%