2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Eco-tool-seeker”: A new and unique business guide for choosing ecodesign tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
1
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
42
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason is that Companies A and B apply other methods which seem to be useful for them, e.g., conventional methods. However, the findings in the case study do not corroborate the part of the statement that ecodesign methods might not even be necessary, since, for example, lists with banned and restricted chemical products and materials (described as an ecodesign method by Rousseaux et al 2017) are used by both companies and appear to be useful.…”
Section: Methods Usedcontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The reason is that Companies A and B apply other methods which seem to be useful for them, e.g., conventional methods. However, the findings in the case study do not corroborate the part of the statement that ecodesign methods might not even be necessary, since, for example, lists with banned and restricted chemical products and materials (described as an ecodesign method by Rousseaux et al 2017) are used by both companies and appear to be useful.…”
Section: Methods Usedcontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…None of the conventional methods described above are included in lists of ecodesign methods compiled by Lindahl and Ekermann (2013), Rousseaux et al (2017), Bovea and Pérez-Belis, (2012), and Rossi et al (2016). Why not?…”
Section: Methods Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pigosso et al [10] identified 350 publications between 1993 and 2015 dealing with tools and methods related to Ecodesign. However, Rousseaux et al [11] suggest that there is still low uptake of such tools.…”
Section: Background Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%