“…Both reflective and generative practice are part of feedback models that reach beyond the work of the individual. Sharing information about one's practice broadly brings knowledge generation outside of the individual and into the testing ground of social reality (Newbrough, 1992; Though both are critical parts of praxis, the latter has an added dimension: forging a continuous link from theory to action, back to theory and action, and especially to a community psychology theory, a theory that is transactional, developmental, and social ecological at its core (Innes, 1981;Jason, 1992;Newbrough, 1992;Tolan et al, 1990;Trickett, 1993). A participant conceptualizer and praxis explicator has the role not only of working within settings to understand and help conceptualize change processes but also of reflecting on action processes that are a part of the setting, of reflecting on theory, and of generating products that share relevant learnings.…”