2019
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2019.17097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecoflex-Passivated Graphene–Yarn Composite for a Highly Conductive and Stretchable Strain Sensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 3 ] So far, flexible strain sensors have been fabricated by using low‐dimensional carbon materials and flexible matrix materials. Low‐dimensional carbon materials are used as conductive materials, such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs), carbon blacks, graphene, [ 3–5 ] nanowires (NWs), [ 6,7 ] nanoparticles (NPs), [ 8,9 ] and their hybrid micro/nanostructures, [ 10,11 ] while flexible matrix materials of strain sensors are elastic polymers including thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), [ 7,8,12 ] styrene‐butadiene‐styrene block copolymer, [ 3,13 ] styrene‐ethylene‐butene‐styrene block copolymer (SEBS), [ 10,14 ] polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), [ 4,15 ] Ecoflex, [ 16 ] and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 3 ] So far, flexible strain sensors have been fabricated by using low‐dimensional carbon materials and flexible matrix materials. Low‐dimensional carbon materials are used as conductive materials, such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs), carbon blacks, graphene, [ 3–5 ] nanowires (NWs), [ 6,7 ] nanoparticles (NPs), [ 8,9 ] and their hybrid micro/nanostructures, [ 10,11 ] while flexible matrix materials of strain sensors are elastic polymers including thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), [ 7,8,12 ] styrene‐butadiene‐styrene block copolymer, [ 3,13 ] styrene‐ethylene‐butene‐styrene block copolymer (SEBS), [ 10,14 ] polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), [ 4,15 ] Ecoflex, [ 16 ] and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In existing researches, many scalable fabrication methods have been proposed to fabricate flexible strain sensors, such as photolithography, [20,21] spraying, [22] laser direct writing, [23,24] inkjet printing, [25] pencil-drawn method, [26] and dip-coating method. [27] These methods often require complicated procedures or are not efficient or cost-effective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a new-emergent strategy for assembly of graphene 1D fibers, nevertheless, the sensing performance as well as the mechanism is far from being fully exploited, especially when the commercial yarn core is always specifically-strengthened by multiple sheathed fiber layers twisted/coiled through certain angles. With the overview of relevant works, for one thing, it is still not understandable about the variation of the reported gauge sensitivity varied noticeably from 1.5 34 to 56.3 35 with different assembling methods and deformation conditions. For another, it is lacking of a systematic work investigating the structure dependent sensitivity, deformability, and reliability, which is crucial for unveiling the sensing mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For another, it is lacking of a systematic work investigating the structure dependent sensitivity, deformability, and reliability, which is crucial for unveiling the sensing mechanism. With effective capability to alter and control different microscopic features such as micro-cracks 36 , wrinkles 37 , and packing densities 35 , the pre-stretch process has already become a commonly-applied strategy to tune the performance of varied nanocarbon sensors, including processing efficiency 38 , mechanical/electrical stability 39 , as well as sensing sensitivity 37 . Following this line of thought, the application of pre-stretch toward the understanding of process dependent sensing property and mechanism for the unique graphene enabled smart yarn is highly significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%