Recent increases in hurricanes led to a need to evaluate access to medical care, medical needs, and personal and community impact on vulnerable populations, particularly elderly, low income, and minority communities. This article examines access to care, interruptions in medical services, personal impact from Hurricane Sandy, and agreement with ecological statements related to storms, flooding and damages in Hispanic/Latino patients receiving health care at Federally Qualified Health Centers in New Jersey. Only 10 % of 335 Hispanic interviewees were U.S. born. Self-identified personal impact was a better indicator of effects from Sandy, health center use, and medical issues, than was a community impact rating. Respondents who gave a high personal impact rating were more likely to have evacuated, had longer power outage, were more likely to need medical care, had more trouble getting to centers, and had more medical interruptions during Sandy. A higher percentage of respondents who evacuated, needed the center, had trouble getting there, and had more “medical need” than those who did not evacuate. The greatest impacts were on respondents who were told to evacuate before the storm, but did not (46 % had “medical need”). The respondents had high agreement ratings for “storms are due to climate change”, followed by “frequent and stronger storms will come more often”, “flooding is due to sea level rise”, and “changing climate is due mainly to human activity and not natural causes”. These ratings will aid public policy makers and planners in developing resiliency strategies for vulnerable coastal communities.