1998
DOI: 10.1139/z98-067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological correlates of mortality of roe deer fawns in a predator-free environment

Abstract: The mortality of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) fawns in summer was studied on Storfosna Island (10 km²), a predator-free island 2 km off the west-central coast of Norway, during a period of rapid population increase. Between 1991 and 1994 the population density increased from about 10 to 40 roe deer/km 2 . During this period 285 live and 36 stillborn fawns were found and the live fawns were all subsequently radio-collared. All observed mortality occurred within the first 35 days of life. The main causes of de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our estimated mortality rate of , 24% is not particularly high in comparison to studies of other species in predator-free environments but rather low for an area with predators (Andersen & Linnell 1998). Gill (1994) found a mean mortality rate of 26% for roe deer fawns, in a 23-year data set from England in a predator-free area, and in studies of other free-ranging ungulates in predatorfree environments, neonate mortality has been reported to range between 10 and 20% (red deer (Guinness et al 1978), white-tailed deer (Ozoga &Verme 1986, McGinnes & Downing 1977, moose (Stubsjoen et al 2000)).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…However, our estimated mortality rate of , 24% is not particularly high in comparison to studies of other species in predator-free environments but rather low for an area with predators (Andersen & Linnell 1998). Gill (1994) found a mean mortality rate of 26% for roe deer fawns, in a 23-year data set from England in a predator-free area, and in studies of other free-ranging ungulates in predatorfree environments, neonate mortality has been reported to range between 10 and 20% (red deer (Guinness et al 1978), white-tailed deer (Ozoga &Verme 1986, McGinnes & Downing 1977, moose (Stubsjoen et al 2000)).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…However, variation in population density affected the family effects: in years of high population density the birth weights of fawns was low, and a high proportion of fawns died soon after birth. In the same study area Andersen & Linnell (1998) showed a strong relationship between density and the proportion of still‐born fawns. We suggest that income breeders like roe deer, which rely heavily on the availability of resources during the reproductive period, need to have mechanisms to adjust the level of maternal care: the selective absorption of a foetus could be such a mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Because offspring survival is unpredictable in income breeders (Gaillard, Festa‐Bianchet & Yoccoz 1998b), including roe deer (Gaillard et al . 1997, 1998a; Andersen & Linnell 1998), successful raising of offspring will depend mostly on resource availability during lactation, for which females have no information during gestation. Roe deer mothers should thus be selected to maximize the number of offspring to produce according to their body weight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fawns were captured and collared as described in Andersen & Linnell (1998). Litter size was estimated at birth (LS BIRTH ), 5 days after birth (LS 5 DAYS ) and 35 days after birth (LS 35 DAYS ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%