Ecological corridors, connecting science and politics: the case of the Green River in the Netherlands

Abstract

Summary 1.During recent decades, the ecological corridor has become a popular concept among ecologists, politicians and nature conservationists. However, it has been criticized from a scientific point of view. In this paper we question why this concept has been accepted so readily in policy and practice. 2. We present a conceptual framework to analyse the rise of the concept, especially in the Netherlands. We have studied the Dutch literature from the period 1980-2005, including the main ecological journal Landschap ( Landscape ), policy documents and reports from the leading Dutch policy-orientated ecology research centre. 3. Many actors, including politicians, stakeholders and scientists, were involved in the development of the ecological corridor and the related National Ecological Network on the national and regional levels. The involvement of these actors changed the character of the concept into the multifunctional 'robust corridor'. 4. The ecological corridor was probably so influential because its vague and flexible character facilitated the coming together of various stakeholders and scientists. It also functions as a metaphor, applicable to well-known entities such as construction and transport. Finally, scientists from the policy-orientated research centre were able to link the concept to fundamental science, policy and practice. In some stages of the policy-defining process, however, conflicts arose between the proponents of scientific soundness and those of social robustness that reduced the role of scientists. 5. Synthesis and applications . To make ecological concepts both scientifically sound and socially robust, several changes must take place in current interactions between ecology and society. First, during concept development it requires the existence of extensive, largely interactive peer groups with clearly defined relationships between scientists and non-scientists. Secondly, the concepts should be flexible and relatable to relevant knowledge, insights, values and practices. Thirdly, several feedback loops between science and non-science should be set up during the various stages of concept development and implementation.

Establishing ecological networks for habitat conservation in the case of Çeşme–Urla Peninsula, Turkey

“…At this point, although the benefits of ecological corridors are mostly appreciated by many scientists all over the world, it is important to indicate that arguments over both benefits and challenges of ecological corridors are still ongoing (Simberloff and Cox 1987;Beier and Noss 1998;Boutani et al 2007;Van Der Windt and Swart 2008). In the context of challenges, Simberloff et al (1992), Hess (1994), and Gruttke and Kornacker (1995) stated that corridors may facilitate the spread of diseases, fires, and predators and lure animals or unexpected gene into the areas that they connects.…”

Transboundary cooperation in establishing ecological networks: The case of Germany's external borders

“…Hence, beside the definitions in conservation biology, the notion of 'ecological network' can also be approached as representing a 'boundary object' (Bowker and Star, 1999, p. 297) or a 'multi-interpretable story line' which can easily function as 'the glue that hold[s] together the coalitions behind transnational policy discourses' (Hajer, 2000, p. 140;cf. also Van der Windt and Swart, 2008).…”

The changing landscape of ecological networks

“…Based on scientific knowledge, the process should create a new type of knowledge, one that is pragmatic, local, and ready for action as well as being validated and evaluated by the group of actors. Post-normal, contextualised and mode 2 science thus do not reject normal science (De Marchi, Funtowicz, & Guimaraes Pereira 2001;Funtowicz & Ravetz 1993, 1994Funtowicz, Ravetz, Shepherd, & Wilkinson 2000;Nowotny et al 2001;Van der Windt & Swart 2008).…”

“…The ecological action network has seen much success because it has been often rendered analogous to other better known networks which are characteristic of our society, such as transport or communication networks, (Keulartz 2007;Van der Windt & Swart 2008). As Musso (1999) points out: "from being natural, the network becomes artificial, (.)…”