1994
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08030629.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological Costs of Livestock Grazing in Western North America

Abstract: Livestock grazing is the most widespread land manageraent pracPice in western North America Seventy percent of the western United States is grazea~ including wilderhess area~ tvlldlife refuge& national forest~ and even some national park~ The ecological costs of this nearly ubiqui. tous form of land use can be drarr~pi~ Examples of such costs include loss of biodiversity; lowering of population densities for a wide variety of taxa~ disruption of ecosystem funcPion~ including nutrient cycling and succession,, c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
643
3
24

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 878 publications
(682 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
12
643
3
24
Order By: Relevance
“…Water quality, hydrologic regimes, ungulate winter range, recreational opportunities, and rare plant populations have been adversely affected by the direct and indirect consequences of livestock grazing. Livestock grazing can result in many ecological changes, including, 1) alteration of ecosystem structure -such as abetting the loss of stable vegetation cover and a general decline in habitat conditions, aiding the spread of weeds, changing vegetation stratification, contributing to soil erosion r and siltation of streams, decreasing the quality and quantity of water, and in woodlands, removal of highly flammable fuels, which helps to reduce the incidence of ground fires that previously controlled dense tree seedling establishment; 2) disruption of ecosystem functions -such as ecological succession and nitrogen and other nutrient cycling; 3) alteration of composition -such as decreases in species richness, and decreases in the density of individual species (Hall 1977;Fleischner 1994;Oliver et al 1994). …”
Section: Livestock Grazing At Craig Mountainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Water quality, hydrologic regimes, ungulate winter range, recreational opportunities, and rare plant populations have been adversely affected by the direct and indirect consequences of livestock grazing. Livestock grazing can result in many ecological changes, including, 1) alteration of ecosystem structure -such as abetting the loss of stable vegetation cover and a general decline in habitat conditions, aiding the spread of weeds, changing vegetation stratification, contributing to soil erosion r and siltation of streams, decreasing the quality and quantity of water, and in woodlands, removal of highly flammable fuels, which helps to reduce the incidence of ground fires that previously controlled dense tree seedling establishment; 2) disruption of ecosystem functions -such as ecological succession and nitrogen and other nutrient cycling; 3) alteration of composition -such as decreases in species richness, and decreases in the density of individual species (Hall 1977;Fleischner 1994;Oliver et al 1994). …”
Section: Livestock Grazing At Craig Mountainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domestic livestock grazing may also lead to 1) competition with native herbivores for forage; 2) impacts on predator control efforts; 3) transmission of disease to native animals; and 4) increased fencing, a common livestock management tool that can create obstacles for some native wildlife (Fleischner 1994, and references cited within).…”
Section: Livestock Grazing At Craig Mountainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These open niches have allowed for the introduction of some highly invasive grasses including the African love-grasses (Eragrostis sp.). Additionally, these high intensity fires have exacerbated effects on soil quality and erosion (Ansley, 2011;Esque et al, 2010;Fleischner, 1994).…”
Section: Chihuahua Desert Fire Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After fire, there is little to no vegetation left to hold the soil from wind and water erosion. The result is typical in all ecosystems after fire, but it is highly detrimental to desert ecosystems as erosion is already viewed as a large threat to desert ecosystems (Fleischner, 1994). Furthermore, many studies have found that fireinduced soils have decreased hydraulic conductivity (K) after burns (Doerr et al, 2000;Ravi et al, 2006;Ravi et al, 2009).…”
Section: Environmental Implications Of Firementioning
confidence: 99%