2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological effectiveness of payment for ecosystem services to identify incentive priority areas: Sloping land conversion program in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The improvement of cropland quality and the development of technology have led to a rise in cropland resource value in Guizhou Province. While the direct value has increased, the indirect value has not fallen sharply, indicating that the ecological environment has been protected during economic development [65].…”
Section: Analysis Of Reasons For the Change In Monetary Accountmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement of cropland quality and the development of technology have led to a rise in cropland resource value in Guizhou Province. While the direct value has increased, the indirect value has not fallen sharply, indicating that the ecological environment has been protected during economic development [65].…”
Section: Analysis Of Reasons For the Change In Monetary Accountmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dalam dua dekade terakhir, implementasi PES berbasis mekanisme insentif telah diadopsi oleh pemerintah untuk mengelola laju dan pola pertumbuhan perkotaan dan konversi lahan pertanian. Penentuan nilai pembayaran untuk perbaikan ekologi atau lingkungan lebih efektif jika penentuan besaran berdasarkan lelang dibanding investasi langsung pemerintah (Ding and Yao 2021).…”
Section: Pengertian Manfaat Dan Dampak Pes Terhadap Lahan Pertanianunclassified
“…It had invested more than CNY (CNY 100 ≈ USD 622.84 in 2015) 500 billion and about 41 million farmers had participated in this project by the end of 2019 [9]. It has contributed to vegetation restoration, soil and water loss amelioration, and carbon sequestrations [1,8,10]. Many researchers used econometric models and remote sensing technology to improve the assessment accuracy of ecological effects [1,[10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has contributed to vegetation restoration, soil and water loss amelioration, and carbon sequestrations [1,8,10]. Many researchers used econometric models and remote sensing technology to improve the assessment accuracy of ecological effects [1,[10][11][12][13]. Although remote sensing technology can be used to observe the real changes in ecological or environmental quality, it is impossible to accurately assess whether Forests 2024, 15, 2 2 of 18 these changes are caused by the implementation of SLCP and estimate the contributions of the SLCP to ecological or environmental quality [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%