Ecological footprint, energy use, trade, and urbanization linkage in Indonesia

Nathaniel, Solomon Prince

doi:10.1007/s10708-020-10175-7

Cited by 167 publications

(86 citation statements)

References 82 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, during the process of globalization, countries require more resources and hence, increase CO 2 emissions (Sushmita et al, 2002). However, contrary to the abovementioned studies, several other studies backed the negative impact of trade on environmental quality (see Destek et al 2018;Nathaniel, 2020;Shahbaz et al, 2019a). Shahbaz et al (2019a) found that international trade reduces CO 2 emissions.…”

Section: International Trade and Co 2 Emissionsmentioning

confidence: 91%

“…Based on the results of the study for EU countries, Destek et al (2018) found that trade reduces CO 2 emissions. The theoretical justification for the negative association between trade and CO 2 emission is provided by Nathaniel (2020) who argued that international trade increases CO 2 emissions in the short run; however, in the long run, access to technologies due to trade enables countries to improve their environmental quality. Chen (2008) argued that imports, exports, FDI inflow, and environmental regulation are important factors affecting CO 2 emissions.…”

Section: International Trade and Co 2 Emissionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Kurniawan and Managi (2018) introduced coal consumption and urbanization in order to examine the relationship between trade openness and CO 2 emissions. Similarly, Nathaniel (2020) introduced energy use and urbanization in the relationship between trade and CO 2 emissions. Both studies of Kurniawan and Managi (2018) and Nathaniel (2020) found a strong positive impact of trade on increasing CO 2 emissions.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Similarly, Nathaniel (2020) introduced energy use and urbanization in the relationship between trade and CO 2 emissions. Both studies of Kurniawan and Managi (2018) and Nathaniel (2020) found a strong positive impact of trade on increasing CO 2 emissions. According to Kurniawan and Managi (2018), trade intensifies the usage of nonrenewable energy sources and hence adds more to environmental pollution.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

International trade and environmental performance in top ten‐emitters countries: The role of eco‐innovation and renewable energy consumption

Ali

Doğan

Chen

et al. 2020

Sustainable Development

162

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The global economy is rising continuously, with a 3-4% aggregate annual growth in output, which poses a severe threat to the environment due to a consistent rise in the use of fossil fuel. Given the disastrous climate change due to the industrialization and increasingly growing demands for energy, countries around the globe are devising strategies to curb the release of greenhouse gases. This study examines the role of environmental innovation, trade, and renewable energy consumption in the nexus between trade and CO 2 emissions for top 10 carbon emitter countries. The results suggest that there is evidence of cross-sectional dependency, and models are suffered from slope heterogeneity problem test popularized by Pesaran and Yamagata.The results of Westerlund cointegration method suggest that in there is long equilibrium relationship among CO 2 emissions and other variables such as environmental innovation, trade, and renewable energy consumption and income. The results of cross-sectionally augment autoregressive distributed lags (CS-ARDL) method suggest that in the long run, environmental innovation, trade, and renewable energy consumption and income are important factors in explaining consumption-based carbon emission and territory-based carbon emission.

show abstract

Section: International Trade and Co 2 Emissionsmentioning

confidence: 91%

Section: International Trade and Co 2 Emissionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

International trade and environmental performance in top ten‐emitters countries: The role of eco‐innovation and renewable energy consumption

Ali

Doğan

Chen

et al. 2020

Sustainable Development

162

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hence, several studies have investgated the impacts of energy use on the levels of EFs. In a study by Nathaniel [50], the author argued that higher levels of energy consumption boost the EF figures of Indonesia, both in the short and long run. In another relevant study on 38 IEA (International Energy Agency) countries, Khan and Hou [51] found per capita energy consumption to be positively correlated to the EF levels.…”

Section: The Literature On Ef and Energy Usementioning

confidence: 99%

Renewable Energy Use and Ecological Footprints Mitigation: Evidence from Selected South Asian Economies

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fossil fuel-dependency has induced a trade-off between economic growth and environmental degradation across the developing nations in particular. Against this backdrop, this study aims to evaluate the impacts of renewable energy use on the ecological footprints in the context of four South Asian fossil fuel-dependent nations: Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. The econometric analysis involves the use of recently developed methods that account for cross-sectional dependency, slope heterogeneity, and structural break issues in the data. The results reveal that renewable energy consumption reduces the ecological footprints while nonrenewable energy use boosts the ecological footprints. The results also confirm the validity of the environmental Kuznets curve and pollution haven hypotheses for the panel of the South Asian nations. Besides, foreign direct investment inflows are found to degrade the environment while higher institutional quality improves it. Furthermore, unidirectional causalities are run from overall energy use, economic growth, and institutional quality to ecological footprints. At the same time, bidirectional associations between foreign direct investment inflows and ecological footprints are also ascertained. The overall findings highlight the pertinence of reducing fossil fuel-dependency, enhancing economic growth, restricting dirty foreign direct investment inflows, and improving institutional quality to ensure environmental sustainability across South Asia.

show abstract

Impacts of industrialization, renewable energy and urbanization on the global ecological footprint: A quantile regression approach

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Debates on how growth and urbanization affect the environment have been intense, but they lack the global perspective. Therefore, this research examined those relationships, and to a greater extent other forms of global environmental degradation, such as foreign direct investment (FDI). It also explored the relationships between industrialization and technologies. The results, using Westerlund cointegration and quantile regressions over the period 1995-2017, show cointegration and regional heterogeneities in the environmental transmissions of economic development, industrialization, renewable energy, urbanization and FDI. The results show that economic development generates more environmental degradation in all quantiles at a global level, whereas urbanization and renewable energy reduce environmental degradation in all quantiles, with the highest effect being in the upper quantiles. On the other hand, industrialization affects the lower quantiles negatively and significantly but affects the upper quantiles positively. Finally, the empirical analysis supports the paradise haven or pollution halo hypothesis (PHH) for the 40th, 50th, 60th and 80th quantiles. This suggests that FDI inflows have a detrimental effect on the host country for these quantiles. Therefore, among the objectives of the policies are to give priority to more sustainable economic growth processes, which contribute to reducing environmental degradation, and furthermore to reinforce strict environmental laws on investment inflows and to build sustainable urbanization and industrialization processes for countries.

show abstract

Ecological footprint, energy use, trade, and urbanization linkage in Indonesia

Cited by 167 publications

References 82 publications

International trade and environmental performance in top ten‐emitters countries: The role of eco‐innovation and renewable energy consumption

International trade and environmental performance in top ten‐emitters countries: The role of eco‐innovation and renewable energy consumption

Renewable Energy Use and Ecological Footprints Mitigation: Evidence from Selected South Asian Economies

Impacts of industrialization, renewable energy and urbanization on the global ecological footprint: A quantile regression approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About