2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological impact & financial feasibility of Energy Recovery (EIFFER) Model for natural insulation material optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New material and designs such as photovoltaic glasses (Sdringola et al, 2014), double glazing with a circulating water chamber (Gil-Lopez and Gimenez-Molina, 2013) and combinations of sucrose and PMMA (Gutierrez and Zohdi, 2014) have a good effect on the thermal insulation of the building, which can save energy consumption of the building and thus reduce carbon emissions. In addition, some natural material such as sugar construction products (Gopinath et al, 2018) and natural insulation material (Sagbansua and Balo, 2017) and artificial material such as PEX (Asadi et al, 2016), transparent silica aerogel (Dowson et al, 2012) and Atactic polypropylene (Vaz and Sheffield, 2014) have a better green performance in the construction industry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New material and designs such as photovoltaic glasses (Sdringola et al, 2014), double glazing with a circulating water chamber (Gil-Lopez and Gimenez-Molina, 2013) and combinations of sucrose and PMMA (Gutierrez and Zohdi, 2014) have a good effect on the thermal insulation of the building, which can save energy consumption of the building and thus reduce carbon emissions. In addition, some natural material such as sugar construction products (Gopinath et al, 2018) and natural insulation material (Sagbansua and Balo, 2017) and artificial material such as PEX (Asadi et al, 2016), transparent silica aerogel (Dowson et al, 2012) and Atactic polypropylene (Vaz and Sheffield, 2014) have a better green performance in the construction industry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ozel studied the effect of the exterior surface solar absorptivity on the thermal characteristics and optimum insulation thickness [19]; conducted a cost analysis for the optimum thicknesses and assessed the environmental impact of different insulation materials [20]; carried out a thermal, economic and environmental analysis of insulated building walls in cold climates [21]; and studied the effect of the glazing area on the optimum insulation thickness for different wall orientations [22]. Sagbansua and Balo [23] studied the potential use of eco-efficient materials in buildings instead of conventional materials using the optimum insulation thickness method, considering both the ecological impact and the financial feasibility. In addition, in the Mediterranean environment, Annibaldi et al [24] studied the environmental and economic benefits of the optimum insulation thickness using a life cycle cost analysis of historic buildings in Italy, and Derradji et al [25] determined the energy savings due to glazing effects on the optimum insulation thickness in a classic home in Algeria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most studies, this analysis is performed using the degree-time method (degree-day or degree-hour). This approach is a simple technique pertaining to the steady state [20,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. However, the degree-time method, in most cases, does not take into account the non-constant operation schedule (lighting, occupancy and equipment), the heat storage effect of walls and the characteristics of the heating and cooling system in the calculation of the heat transfer through the external wall [43].…”
Section: Analysis Methods and Conditions 221 Energy Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%