2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.02.03.479020
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological insights into soil health according to the life-history traits and environment-wide associations of bacteria in agricultural soils

Abstract: Soil health assessment may be enhanced by monitoring changes in bacterial populations that are indicators of various biological, physical, and chemical properties of soil. However, the lack of ecological information for many abundant bacteria in agricultural soils limits our understanding of indicator responses and, thus, their utility for guiding management. We identified bacterial indicators of twelve conventional measures of soil health, and tillage intensity, from a 16S rRNA gene-based survey of farmland a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 106 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified three bacterial species groups (phylotypes) based on their high relative abundance and widespread occurrence in a 16S rRNA gene-based survey of agricultural soils across the United States ( Wilhelm et al, 2022a , b ). Representative sequences for these phylotypes were classified to the genera Arthrobacter , Bacillus , and Mycolicibacterium and were detected in 91% ( = 1.2% of total reads), 65% (0.2%), and 61% (0.3%) of 778 samples, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified three bacterial species groups (phylotypes) based on their high relative abundance and widespread occurrence in a 16S rRNA gene-based survey of agricultural soils across the United States ( Wilhelm et al, 2022a , b ). Representative sequences for these phylotypes were classified to the genera Arthrobacter , Bacillus , and Mycolicibacterium and were detected in 91% ( = 1.2% of total reads), 65% (0.2%), and 61% (0.3%) of 778 samples, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%