2015
DOI: 10.1037/adb0000129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological momentary assessment of PTSD symptoms and alcohol use in combat veterans.

Abstract: Despite high rates of comorbid hazardous alcohol use and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the nature of the functional relationship between these problems is not fully understood. Insufficient evidence exists to fully support models commonly used to explain the relationship between hazardous alcohol use and PTSD including the self-medication hypothesis and the mutual maintenance model. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) can monitor within-day fluctuations of symptoms and drinking to provide novel infor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
93
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
6
93
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Possemato et al (2015) assessed the relationship between alcohol use and the intensity of PTSD by EMA. The authors reported an accentuation of alcohol use as a function of PTSD severity, particularly overnight.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possemato et al (2015) assessed the relationship between alcohol use and the intensity of PTSD by EMA. The authors reported an accentuation of alcohol use as a function of PTSD severity, particularly overnight.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One clinical method that is particularly powerful for assessing the SMH is the ecological momentary analysis method, which uses real‐time data to uncover the complex interplay between MD/AD symptoms and substance use. Previous work using this method has shown support for the SMH (Gorka, Hedeker, Piasecki, & Mermelstein, 2017; Possemato et al., 2015). Epidemiological studies using general population samples can overcome some of the limitations of treatment‐seeking samples, such as treatment‐seeking bias, by being representative of the general population (Alegria et al., 2010; Crum, La Flair et al., 2013; Crum, Mojtabai et.al., 2013; Farmer et al., 2017; Feingold, Weiser, Rehm, & Lev‐ran, 2015, 2016; Fergusson, Boden, & Horwood, 2009; Kessler et al., 1997; Kuo, Gardner, Kendler, & Prescott, 2006; Lazareck et al., 2012; Liang, Chikritzhs, & Lenton, 2011; Martins et al., 2012; Martins, Keyes, Storr, Zhu, & Chilcoat, 2009; Menary, Kushner, Maurer, & Thuras, 2011; Robinson, Sareen, Cox, & Bolton, 2011; Sareen et al., 2001; Swendsen et al., 1998; Wolitzky‐Taylor, Bobova, Zinbarg, Mineka, & Craske, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed description of our iterative development process involving both veteran and behavioral health clinician input has been reported (Possemato et al, 2015). Due to name overlap with another web-based program for veterans, we have changed the name of the program from “Coming Home and Moving Forward” to “Thinking Forward”.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%