1965
DOI: 10.1037/h0022614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological optics and visual slant.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an interchange of papers, Flock (1965) and Freeman (1965Freeman ( , 1966b have debated the relative merits of optical theta and perspective as explanations of slant perception. Freeman argues that optical theta requires too complex an analytical operation to be a likely perceptual process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an interchange of papers, Flock (1965) and Freeman (1965Freeman ( , 1966b have debated the relative merits of optical theta and perspective as explanations of slant perception. Freeman argues that optical theta requires too complex an analytical operation to be a likely perceptual process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his criticism of my theoretical paper on visual slant perception (Flock, 1964a), Freeman (1965) claims that variables of surface texture are both ineffectual and unnecessary for the perception of slant. He argues that all perceived slants are a function primarily of linear outline perspective (contour convergence) and that the greater the linear perspective the greater the judged visual slant.…”
Section: Dartmouth Collegementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the superficial level that I have described these data, it would seem that there might be some basis for Freeman's (1965) claim. But let us look more closely at these experiments cited by Freeman.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flock considered contour gradients containing linear perspective to be special cases of texture gradients, while Freeman considered texture gradients to be special cases of contour gradients. Braunstein (1976) observes that both Flock (1964aFlock ( , 1965 and Freeman (1965Freeman ( , 1966b were in a sense correct and emphasizes that the same mathematical information for slant is available from each source, although he warns that the perceptual salience of different sources varies situationally. Braunstein's point can be expanded to include all sources of information about surface slant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the studies just cited investigated a single SOurce of information or placed two sources in competition to determine which was perceptually more salient or which yielded more accurate judgments. Methodological concerns seemed to require isolation of sources of information, thereby fostering debate concerning the primacy of various sources, such as the exchange between Flock (1964aFlock ( , 1965 and Freeman (1965Freeman ( , 1966b. Flock considered contour gradients containing linear perspective to be special cases of texture gradients, while Freeman considered texture gradients to be special cases of contour gradients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%