2018
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15081635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological Public Health and Participatory Planning and Assessment Dilemmas: The Case of Water Resources Management

Abstract: Water is a key driver for socio-economic development, livelihoods and ecosystem integrity. This is reflected in the emergence of unified paradigms such as Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) and the weight accorded to it in the Sustainable Development Goals agenda. This paper interrogated the effectiveness of existing participatory planning and assessment models adapted from IWRM model on water quality and public health at community level. The analysis was built around public health ecology perspective… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As well as advancing nation-building, the government embraced the international Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) paradigm 21. Over time, IWRM came to be seen as overly complex and technocratic, however, limiting the state’s role, with insufficient attention to context, integration and overlooking poverty alleviation 22. This was followed by calls for a renewed focus on context in policy, strategic intervention and resource mobilisation with community participation as a unifying concept 23 24.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well as advancing nation-building, the government embraced the international Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) paradigm 21. Over time, IWRM came to be seen as overly complex and technocratic, however, limiting the state’s role, with insufficient attention to context, integration and overlooking poverty alleviation 22. This was followed by calls for a renewed focus on context in policy, strategic intervention and resource mobilisation with community participation as a unifying concept 23 24.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perception of risk, habit, social status, and age as individual attributes are thus critical in collective action decision-making [20]. At community level analytical and conceptual lenses that unbundle cognitive biases and failures, as well as, integrate and transform individual and collective agency are critical in risk reduction and resilience building [69]. Theoretical and empirical multiplicity lenses improve analytical rigour, address conceptual and knowledge gaps, as well as, solve complex problems and contextual dilemmas while encouraging synergies [25,59].…”
Section: Cognitive Failure and Mitigation Of Ecosystem Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…South Korea was considered the second most affected nation until March 2020; however, as of late May 2020, the South Korean public health system is deemed a model of virus containment. South Korea's public health authorities never implemented a "true" lockdown [1][2][3]. Most businesses stayed open, and borders have not been completely closed down to prevent overseas travel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%