Ecological regional analysis applied to campus sustainability performance

Abstract

Purpose Sustainability performance in higher education is often evaluated at a generalized large scale. It remains unknown to what extent campus efforts address regional sustainability needs. This study begins to address this gap by evaluating trends in performance through the lens of regional environmental characteristics. Design/methodology/approach Four sustainability metrics across 300 North American institutions are analyzed between 2005 and 2014. The study applies two established regional frameworks to group and assess the institutions: Commission on Environmental Cooperation Ecoregions and WaterStat (water scarcity status). Standard t-tests were used to assess significant differences between the groupings of institutions as compared to the North American study population as a whole. Findings Results indicate that all institutions perform statistically uniformly for most variables when grouped at the broadest (Level I) ecoregional scale. One exception is the Marine West Coast Forest ecoregion where institutions outperformed the North American average for several variables. Only when institutions are grouped at a smaller scale of (Level III) ecoregions do the majority of significant performance patterns emerge. Research limitations/implications This paper demonstrates an ecoregions-based analytical approach to evaluating sustainability performance that contrasts with common evaluation methods in the implementation field. This research also identifies a gap in the literature explicitly linking ecological sub-regions with their associated environmental challenges and identifies next research steps in developing defensible regional targets for applied sustainability efforts. Practical implications The practical implications of this research include the following: substantive changes to methodologies for rating sustainability leadership and performance, a framework that incentivizes institutions to frame sustainability efforts in terms of collaborative or collective impact, a framework within which institutions can meaningfully prioritize efforts, and a potential shift toward regional impact metrics rather than those focused solely on campus-based or generalized targets. Originality/value The authors believe this to be the first effort to analyze North American higher education sustainability performance using regional frameworks.

Gestão das instituições de ensino superior: o desenvolvimento da sustentabilidade como estratégia organizacional

“…Muitos argumentam que as ferramentas de relatórios de sustentabilidade devem ampliar seu escopo além da mitigação e da ecoeficiência para abranger uma versão holística e orientada para o valor da sustentabilidade. Para reconhecer a posição da IES dentro de um sistema sócio ecológico mais amplo e complexo, as ferramentas de relatórios de sustentabilidade devem incorporar especificidades biofísicas regionais (Hansen;Lehmann, 2006;Newman, 2012;Dias, 2006;Weber et al, 2017 ações além dos portões do campus e parcerias fortes. Em termos de método as ferramentas de relatórios de sustentabilidade devem se tornar mais integrativas e participativas para institucionalizar processos de aprendizagem transformadores (Sharp;Pollock Shea, 2012;Rammel et al, 2014;Glasser;Hirch, 2016).…”

Towards Carbon Neutrality in Higher Education Institutions: Case of Two Private Universities in Colombia

“…Regarding sustainability in HEIs, one can find numerous examples of efforts that have been reported from several countries, including, for instance: the United States and Canada [13,14], Italy [15], Ecuador [16], Portugal [17], Brazil [18,19], Turkey [20], Jordan [21], and Colombia [22], among others. At the end of the first decade of 2000, Rauch and Newman [23] derived a qualitative/quantitative methodology to define what a sustainable metric target might be and how it can be used to describe the path for universities towards sustainability, using short to long-term time scales.…”