2021
DOI: 10.1002/bse.2822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological responsiveness and business performance: Four scenarios of compatibility and a multi‐faceted strategies framework

Abstract: This paper investigates the link between business actors' perceptions of the compatibility between ecological responsiveness and business performance and the level of corporate commitment to address ecological issues. The dichotomy between peripheral (or symbolic) actions and embedded (or substantive) actions traditionally assumed in business research arguably reflects a limited conceptualisation of the link between ecological responsiveness and business performance. It fails to exhaustively explain how compan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(108 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, the core components of a framework that clarifies fundamental aspects of the dynamics involved in dyadic business–NGO partnerships are articulated. The propositions are drawn from an analysis of the literature on religious and cultural syncretism—building therefore upon the work of Martinez (2013) and Martinez et al (2019, 2021)—and the identification of key elements that can be extended to enrich our theoretical understanding of the capacity of businesses and NGOs to collaborate and manage the complex dynamics that the collision of their prevailing idea systems generates. The paper outlines a research agenda, including a set of research directions and theoretical ramifications about the factors that motivate businesses and NGOs to engage in, and sustain, partnerships that meet the normative expectations placed on them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, the core components of a framework that clarifies fundamental aspects of the dynamics involved in dyadic business–NGO partnerships are articulated. The propositions are drawn from an analysis of the literature on religious and cultural syncretism—building therefore upon the work of Martinez (2013) and Martinez et al (2019, 2021)—and the identification of key elements that can be extended to enrich our theoretical understanding of the capacity of businesses and NGOs to collaborate and manage the complex dynamics that the collision of their prevailing idea systems generates. The paper outlines a research agenda, including a set of research directions and theoretical ramifications about the factors that motivate businesses and NGOs to engage in, and sustain, partnerships that meet the normative expectations placed on them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the domains of culture and religion, the tendency has been to forge a dual conception of syncretism as both a pejorative and a nonpejorative idea (Martinez, 2013). The pejorative conception of syncretism is often described to mean the ‘inauthentic’ or the ‘contamination’ of a presumably ‘pure’ tradition by features (e.g., values, beliefs, symbols and meanings) seen as belonging to foreign, conflicting traditions (Shaw & Stewart, 1994, p. 1).…”
Section: Syncretizing Idea Systems: Pejorative and Nonpejorative Assu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that commitment to sustainability varies among organisations that approach sustainability in several ways, from marketing and communication perspectives to financing and spending decisions. The literature describes this perspective as a continuum from peripheral embeddedness of sustainability to substantive embeddedness (Hyatt and Berente, 2017;Ivory and MacKay, 2020;Martinez, 2021). From a peripheral frame of reference, the organisation's actions will adopt "less bad" strategies such as reducing emissions and resources and saving costs.…”
Section: The Concept Of Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process would be associated with the complexity and inconsistency of the indicators used (Spaiser et al, 2017;Swain, 2018;Ala-Uddin, 2019;Del Río et al, 2021), which are shaped by the regulations, culture and individual values of the organisational context (Ferrer et al, 2020;L opez-Arceiz et al, 2020aL opez-Arceiz et al, , 2020b. According to Berrone et al (2017), Yang et al (2020), Diaz-Sarachaga (2021), García-Meca and Martínez-Ferrero (2021), Zych (2021) and Calabrese et al (2021), these limitations can lead to greenwashing processes, as companies may be tempted to adopt some sustainability management tools that would allow them to display an inaccurate level of corporate sustainability development (Martinez, 2021;Seele and Schultz, 2022). There are various drivers that can explain the emergence of greenwashing: external, organisational and internal (Delmas and Cuerel, 2011;Wu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Sustainable Management Tools: Measuring Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%