2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological risk assessment of cities on the Tibetan Plateau based on land use/land cover changes – Case study of Delingha City

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
121
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comprehensive ecological risk values of different ERA units were calculated individually to obtain the ecological risk level for the center point of the unit, which was the sample for the spatial interpolation analysis within the ERA [52]. An ordinary Kriging interpolation in the geostatistical module of ArcGIS10.2 was used to obtain the spatial distribution for the landscape ecological risk of the Zoige Plateau [24,53]. Combined with the actual condition and the ERI values of the area in the four stages as well as the classification method of Lv et al and Zhang et al, the ERI was classified into five ecological risk levels [23,27], namely, the lowest-level risk (ERI ≤ 0.050), lower-level risk (0.050 < ERI ≤ 0.060), moderate-level risk (0.060 < ERI ≤ 0.070), higher-level risk (0.070 < ERI ≤ 0.085) and highest-level risk (ERI > 0.085).…”
Section: Construction Of the Land Use/cover Era Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The comprehensive ecological risk values of different ERA units were calculated individually to obtain the ecological risk level for the center point of the unit, which was the sample for the spatial interpolation analysis within the ERA [52]. An ordinary Kriging interpolation in the geostatistical module of ArcGIS10.2 was used to obtain the spatial distribution for the landscape ecological risk of the Zoige Plateau [24,53]. Combined with the actual condition and the ERI values of the area in the four stages as well as the classification method of Lv et al and Zhang et al, the ERI was classified into five ecological risk levels [23,27], namely, the lowest-level risk (ERI ≤ 0.050), lower-level risk (0.050 < ERI ≤ 0.060), moderate-level risk (0.060 < ERI ≤ 0.070), higher-level risk (0.070 < ERI ≤ 0.085) and highest-level risk (ERI > 0.085).…”
Section: Construction Of the Land Use/cover Era Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This coarse-scale approach leads to relatively rough evaluation results and fails to reflect the precise areas of risk occurrence in a large region. With the broad application of the theory and methods of landscape ecology, the technique of ERA based on landscape patterns has become a focus in regional ecosystem management [24]. The landscape ERA method can characterize the impact of human activities or natural change on the landscape composition, structure, function and process of all LULC types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the perspective of landscape, a vulnerability model was constructed that followed the susceptibility to the exposure sensitivity and stressor adaptive capacity of the framework. Vulnerability of risk can be measured as follows [46][47][48][49]:…”
Section: ) Ecological Vulnerability In Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the ecosystem is undergoing increasing pressures and degeneration owing to climate change, urban sprawl, and human activities [1][2][3][4]. The environmental problems following those pressures, such as global warming [5], soil erosion [6], desertification [7], environment pollution [8], and loss of biodiversity [9], have changed the ecosystem structure and process, decreased the ecosystem service value, and posed great threats to region sustainable development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%