2015
DOI: 10.1134/s1067413615050045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological status of bats (Chiroptera) in winter roosts in eastern Fennoscandia

Abstract: Data of field observations on bats hibernating in the Republic of Karelia (61°-63° N, 30°-36° E) are presented. Various bat winter roosts have been surveyed to reveal the species composition of the animals, the pattern of their spatial arrangement, mortality, and specific regional features and general trends of their hibernation. The results provide a more integrated feature of ecological adaptations of these mammals to the conditions of the North. * Designations: M. br, Myotis brandtii; M. my, Myotis mystacin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in the antioxidant capacity among the studied species can be explained by ecophysiological characteristics of vesper bat species and indicate that M. brandtii, E. nilssonii, and P. auritus have different defense mechanisms against ROS formation during torporarousal cycles. E. nilssonii lives in colder areas with a shorter photoperiod and hibernation of this species occurs at lower temperatures (2.0 ± 0.1 °С) and relative humidity (78.0 ± 0.6%) as compared with other species of bats (M. brandtii, P. auritus, and M. daubentoni), affirming that this species is well adapted to the north's severe conditions (Siivonen and Wermundsen, 2008;Belkin et al, 2015). In contrast, M. brandtii hibernated in the warmer and more comfortable locations and used both energy-saving ways (crevices and clusters) for torpor (Siivonen and Wermundsen, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The differences in the antioxidant capacity among the studied species can be explained by ecophysiological characteristics of vesper bat species and indicate that M. brandtii, E. nilssonii, and P. auritus have different defense mechanisms against ROS formation during torporarousal cycles. E. nilssonii lives in colder areas with a shorter photoperiod and hibernation of this species occurs at lower temperatures (2.0 ± 0.1 °С) and relative humidity (78.0 ± 0.6%) as compared with other species of bats (M. brandtii, P. auritus, and M. daubentoni), affirming that this species is well adapted to the north's severe conditions (Siivonen and Wermundsen, 2008;Belkin et al, 2015). In contrast, M. brandtii hibernated in the warmer and more comfortable locations and used both energy-saving ways (crevices and clusters) for torpor (Siivonen and Wermundsen, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Using prolonged periods of torpor, hibernators can survive on stored fat for months 1 . However, surviving the whole winter season on fat reserves can be a challenge, especially when harsh conditions occur at the end of the winter 7,8 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%