2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological tradeoffs of stabilized salt marshes as a shoreline protection strategy: Effects of artificial structures on macrobenthic assemblages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…). Our findings agree with those of Bilkovic & Mitchell () who studied various effects of erosion prevention by creating a marsh in combination with a stabilizing structure, such as a low stone dam (as at our study sites). Such stabilized salt marshes are currently being implemented in many US coastal states, not only to control erosion but also to restore coastal habitats (see Currin et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…). Our findings agree with those of Bilkovic & Mitchell () who studied various effects of erosion prevention by creating a marsh in combination with a stabilizing structure, such as a low stone dam (as at our study sites). Such stabilized salt marshes are currently being implemented in many US coastal states, not only to control erosion but also to restore coastal habitats (see Currin et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…With the global decline in natural estuarine and coastal systems, there is much interest in economically valuing the services provided by these habitats to leverage their conservation and restoration . Marsh sills, however, supported epifaunal suspension feeders, such as oysters, which colonized the rock sill and a lower deposit-feeding infaunal biomass than natural marshes (Bilkovic & Mitchell, 2013). However, created or restored habitats may not be effective at providing the same suite of services as natural ecosystems (Bilkovic & Mitchell, 2013 In particular, ecological trade-offs may occur with hybrid coastal protection that incorporates structural elements to facilitate restored habitats (Bilkovic & Mitchell, 2013).…”
Section: Additional Ecosystem Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To accurately evaluate the benefits of using nature-based coastal defence, cost-benefit analyses need to include all ecosystem services provided by eco-engineered and traditional coastal defence. A greater number of suspension feeders, however, could increase water filtration and thus the water quality services (Bilkovic & Mitchell, 2013). For instance, created saltmarsh in combination with a stabilizing structure, such as a low-profile rock sill is increasingly used in the United States for shoreline protection, as well as to restore coastal habitat.…”
Section: Additional Ecosystem Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous restoration projects are initiated with the objective of reestablishing the macrobenthos community characteristics of riparian wetlands (Bilkovic and Mitchell 2013;Everaert et al 2013). In these instances, macrobenthos diversity and abundance are expected to increase because improving soil quality exceeds the thresholds of species tolerance after restoration.…”
Section: Influence Of Hydrological Connectivity On Macroinvertebrate mentioning
confidence: 99%