2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecology and Evolution of Communication in Social Insects

Abstract: Insect life strategies comprise all levels of sociality from solitary to eusocial, in which individuals form persistent groups and divide labor. With increasing social complexity, the need to communicate a greater diversity of messages arose to coordinate division of labor, group cohesion, and concerted actions. Here we summarize the knowledge on prominent messages in social insects that inform about reproduction, group membership, resource locations, and threats and discuss potential evolutionary trajectories… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
293
0
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 312 publications
(303 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
2
293
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Serving as intra-and interspecific recognition cues, it is likely that, similar to parabioses, insects adapt their CHC profiles to other biotic interactions, including predator-prey, parasitic or mutualistic relationships [17,61]. At the same time, ants need CHC profiles that can encode a multitude of information [4]. This may limit the evolution of very simple profiles or those dominated by n-alkanes, which are believed to convey little information [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serving as intra-and interspecific recognition cues, it is likely that, similar to parabioses, insects adapt their CHC profiles to other biotic interactions, including predator-prey, parasitic or mutualistic relationships [17,61]. At the same time, ants need CHC profiles that can encode a multitude of information [4]. This may limit the evolution of very simple profiles or those dominated by n-alkanes, which are believed to convey little information [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While species-specific compounds allow species recognition, colony-specific profiles are important for inbreeding avoidance [25]. Queens communicate their fertility through their CHC profile and/or glandular secretions [2]. Besides these functions, CHCs experience selection from social parasites [26,27], which are thought to be a major driver of recognition cue diversity [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognition cues are usually blended within a colony through trophallaxis and grooming, with the postpharyngeal gland serving as a reservoir, where CHCs obtained by grooming are mixed and re-distributed [5]. They are also affected by environmental factors such as nest material or food [6,7] and social parameters for instance queen signals, so that the colony odour is constantly updated [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though insects in particular rely predominantly on chemotactile sensing to detect harmful compounds (de Brito Sanchez et al, 2005;Falibene et al, 2015), recognize mates (Blomquist and Bagneres, 2010;Leonhardt et al, 2016;Wilson, 1971), differentiate between colony members and foreigners (Fletcher and Michener, 1987;Leonhardt et al, 2016;Wilson, 1971) or determine food quality (de Brito Sanchez, 2011;Ruedenauer et al, 2015), surprisingly little is known on the neuronal processing of chemotactile information or the contribution of different sensory modalities (i.e. tactile, gustatory and olfactory cues) in insects other than Drosophila (Masek and Keene, 2016;Singh, 1997;Zhang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%