Urban Ecology 2011
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199563562.003.0020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecology of Urban Amphibians and Reptiles: Urbanophiles, Urbanophobes, and the Urbanoblivious

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A major consequence of urbanization is the filtering of species, often resulting in lower biodiversity such that a subset of the original native community is represented in the urban habitat (Aronson et al., ; Forman, ). In general, urban communities are dominated by urban‐tolerant species, with abundances declining as urbanization increases and diversity declining as cities age (Forman, ; Grant, Middendorf, Colgan, Ahmad, & Vogel, ; McKinney, ; Shochat, Warren, Faeth, McIntyre, & Hope, ). However, urbanization can generate novel habitat space under some circumstances, resulting in new ecological opportunities and species colonization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major consequence of urbanization is the filtering of species, often resulting in lower biodiversity such that a subset of the original native community is represented in the urban habitat (Aronson et al., ; Forman, ). In general, urban communities are dominated by urban‐tolerant species, with abundances declining as urbanization increases and diversity declining as cities age (Forman, ; Grant, Middendorf, Colgan, Ahmad, & Vogel, ; McKinney, ; Shochat, Warren, Faeth, McIntyre, & Hope, ). However, urbanization can generate novel habitat space under some circumstances, resulting in new ecological opportunities and species colonization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the causal factor(s), the density of this sloth population is orders of magnitude higher than previously reported for this species, suggesting that sloths may be an interesting and important component of tropical urban landscapes. Indeed, given their densities in urban areas (Table 4), sloths may well be considered a tropical, urbanophilic species (Grant et al, 2011). The existence of this high population density of B. tridactylus in an urban forest strongly affirms the need to recognize that the establishment of green spaces in cities in the tropics is likely to encourage species conservation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…might allow for a substantial increase in population size (Réus & Martins de Souza, 2007). While this hypothesis may be possible, the loss of natural predators could be offset by an increase in non-natural predators (Grant et al, 2011). More data are needed to resolve this issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species that inhabit urban areas are referred to as 'urbanophiles' (see McKinney 2006); Grant et al (2011) however, use the term 'temporally urbanoblivious' for species that are generally oblivious to urbanization. The persistence of these species is tied to long life spans and successful recruitment from within populations and Grant et al (2011) hold up C. serpentina as a prime example of this classification.…”
Section: Conservation and Management Implications In Urban Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The persistence of these species is tied to long life spans and successful recruitment from within populations and Grant et al (2011) hold up C. serpentina as a prime example of this classification. The multiplicity of habitats within cities varies widely with regards to suitability for particular species; temporally urbanoblivious species are more reliant on cryptic habitats within this matrix than are true urbanophiles who thrive in the city at large.…”
Section: Conservation and Management Implications In Urban Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%