2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1816542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Econometric Estimates of Deterrence of the Death Penalty: Facts or Ideology?

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been argued elsewhere that economists usually focus on deterrent effects of legislation (see e.g. Cameron 1988, Kirchgässner 2011, or Robinson and Darley 2004. Generally speaking, most studies pointing out this specificity of the economic perspective call into question the deterrent effect of many forms of legal codification, or at least of increases of available punishment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been argued elsewhere that economists usually focus on deterrent effects of legislation (see e.g. Cameron 1988, Kirchgässner 2011, or Robinson and Darley 2004. Generally speaking, most studies pointing out this specificity of the economic perspective call into question the deterrent effect of many forms of legal codification, or at least of increases of available punishment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. For an overview on this literature see, for example, G. KIRCHGÄSSNER (2011) as well as the literature mentioned in Footnote 2 above and discussed in Section 3 of this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%