2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic analysis of a grid-connected commercial photovoltaic system at Colorado State University-Pueblo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Paudel and Sarper [7] conducted an economic analysis with regard to an investment in a photovoltaic plant located in a semidesert area of Colorado.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paudel and Sarper [7] conducted an economic analysis with regard to an investment in a photovoltaic plant located in a semidesert area of Colorado.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported in [76], despite the efforts made by some states to develop energy policies to support RES development and fuel diversity by passing renewable portfolio standards, California and some others have decided to use FIT because of the benefits it presented to countries such as Germany. However, FITs are provided alongside other support mechanisms, for example, in addition to federal tax credits, the state government of Colorado gave financial incentives for generation and deployment of solar power [77].…”
Section: The United States and Australiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RETScreen was developed to evaluate energy production, life-cycle costs, and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions of various types of renewable energy systems [32][33][34][35][36]. In RETScreen, the performance of different types of renewable energy sources, including wind power [37,38], hydro power [39,40], PV [41][42][43], combined heat and power (CHP) [35], bio energy [44,45], solar heating [33,[46][47][48], and geothermal heating and cooling [49], can be evaluated. RETScreen allows users to compare the economic performance of conventional systems and RES alternative systems for optimal design.…”
Section: Design Tools For Res In Buildingsmentioning
confidence: 99%