2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic analysis of conventional versus selective demolition—A case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
68
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
68
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a detailed economic analysis of conventional versus selective demolition [1] showed that in spite of the economic viability of selective demolition depending largely on labour costs, tipping fees, and market prices for recovered materials, it may ultimately be more profitable than the conventional demolition approach. Furthermore, there are clear benefits from an environmental point of view from using selective demolition, namely in a direct reduction in the material sent to landfill [2,3] as well as other environmental impacts specifically caused by climatic change, acidification, summer smog, nitrification and amount of heavy metals [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a detailed economic analysis of conventional versus selective demolition [1] showed that in spite of the economic viability of selective demolition depending largely on labour costs, tipping fees, and market prices for recovered materials, it may ultimately be more profitable than the conventional demolition approach. Furthermore, there are clear benefits from an environmental point of view from using selective demolition, namely in a direct reduction in the material sent to landfill [2,3] as well as other environmental impacts specifically caused by climatic change, acidification, summer smog, nitrification and amount of heavy metals [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of selective demolition is still often seen by the industry as having debateable economic benefit and little practical value. However, a detailed economic analysis of conventional versus selective demolition 1 showed that, in spite of the economic viability of selective demolition depending largely on labour costs, tipping fees, and market prices for recovered materials, it may ultimately be more profitable than conventional demolition. Furthermore, there are clear benefits from an environmental point of view from using selective demolition, namely a direct reduction of the material sent to landfill 2,3 as well as other environmental impacts specifically caused by climatic change, acidification, summer smog, nitrification and amount of heavy metals 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many possible demolition methods, such as using explosives, wrecking balls, hydraulic crushers and pulverisers, and manual dismantling. The selection of the demolition method that will be used is dependent on the project conditions, construction type, work force, time and site constraints and the availability of equipment (Coelho and Brito 2011;Guy 2003;CTIC 1995;CIB 2005;Shultmann 2005). But, the selection of the demolition method also greatly affects both the mass and the quality of glass that can be recycled or re-used and the overall cost of the whole operation (Coelho and Brito 2011).…”
Section: Problem Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of the demolition method that will be used is dependent on the project conditions, construction type, work force, time and site constraints and the availability of equipment (Coelho and Brito 2011;Guy 2003;CTIC 1995;CIB 2005;Shultmann 2005). But, the selection of the demolition method also greatly affects both the mass and the quality of glass that can be recycled or re-used and the overall cost of the whole operation (Coelho and Brito 2011). For instance, explosives or hydraulic crushers and pulverisers are often employed because these methods significantly save on time and labour (Wu et al 2014).…”
Section: Problem Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%