2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2262792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Analysis of Medical Malpractice Liability and Its Reform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In theory, legal liability incentivizes providers to internalize the costs of their mistakes and take appropriate care to avoid them, which can promote the provision of safe and effective care (Arlen, 2013). For example, if a provider knows that she faces a 10% chance of causing a $10,000 harm to a patient and being held liable for that harm, then she has a financial incentive to invest $500 in learning a new technique that reduces the probability of harm (and liability) to only 5%.…”
Section: Malpractice Liabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory, legal liability incentivizes providers to internalize the costs of their mistakes and take appropriate care to avoid them, which can promote the provision of safe and effective care (Arlen, 2013). For example, if a provider knows that she faces a 10% chance of causing a $10,000 harm to a patient and being held liable for that harm, then she has a financial incentive to invest $500 in learning a new technique that reduces the probability of harm (and liability) to only 5%.…”
Section: Malpractice Liabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several rationales have been used to oppose the introduction of experience‐rated premiums at the individual physician level (e.g., a high variability of claims over short time periods, which makes it difficult to obtain a stable risk estimate). However, those arguments do not necessarily hold at the hospital level, and there is an ongoing debate over whether experience‐rated premiums at the hospital level should be extensively adopted (Arlen, ; Mello, ; Sloan, ; Ellis et. al , ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 Smatra se kako od 4 do18 % pacijenata trpe posljedice liječničke nepažnje u obavljanju medicinskog tretmana sa brojnim štetnim posljedicama na zdravlje i ekonomsku sferu pacijenata, pritom tek manji broj štetnih događaja biva predmetom građanskopravnog postupka za naknadu štete. 60 Neovisno o tome, financijski izdatci uvjetovani postupanjem liječnika contra legem artis izravno dovode do povećanja bolničkih rashoda u rasponu od 1.246,00 do 4.769,00 USD godišnje, ovisno o tipu zdravstvene ustanove i specifičnom medicinskom tretmanu koje se tamo provodi. Prema američkom Institute of Medicine ukupni godišnji izdatci po različitim osnovama, a koji su per directum et indirectum izazvani postupanjem liječnika i drugog zdravstvenog osoblja protivnom pravilima medicinske struke procjenjuju se na čak od 17 do 29 milijardi dolara godišnje!…”
Section: Financijski Učinci I Trendovi Odštetnopravne Odgovornosti Zbunclassified