2021
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic and Environmental Cost Analysis of Cold In-Place Recycling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One case study published in the International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research described the successful application of CMA for repairing potholes in rural roads in India. The study found that cold mix asphalt was a cost-effective and environmentally friendly solution that could be easily applied using manual labor and minimal equipment [40]. In another case study, cold mix asphalt was used to repair Alaska airport runways.…”
Section: Case Studies: Successful Applications Of Cold MIX Asphaltmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One case study published in the International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research described the successful application of CMA for repairing potholes in rural roads in India. The study found that cold mix asphalt was a cost-effective and environmentally friendly solution that could be easily applied using manual labor and minimal equipment [40]. In another case study, cold mix asphalt was used to repair Alaska airport runways.…”
Section: Case Studies: Successful Applications Of Cold MIX Asphaltmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon encourages an approximately lower cost of fuel compared to HMA. The use of a recycled mix of CMA or cold in-place recycling (CIR) technology reduces the energy consumption by 57% to 63%, which resulted in cost savings of up to $10,000 to $12,000 (approximately) [14]. CIR techniques observed cost savings of $34,000-$39,000 approximately compared to HMA.…”
Section: Economic Aspects Of Using Cmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CIR techniques observed cost savings of $34,000-$39,000 approximately compared to HMA. The overall cost saving is 41% to 47% when considering energy, construction and environmental costs [14]. Table 1 illustrates the comparison between the energy consumption and cost for HMA and CIR mixtures containing bitumen emulsion and foam bitumen for 1.6 lane kilometer (LKM).…”
Section: Economic Aspects Of Using Cmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transportation industry and pavement construction are major contributors to resource depletion and environmental pollution (1). The use of recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) materials has, therefore, become increasingly common in pavement construction as a result of its cost and environmental benefits (2)(3)(4)(5)(6). RAP is defined as deteriorated asphalt pavement removed from a paved surface containing aged asphalt mixture (asphalt binder and aggregates) (7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%