2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2018.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic and statistical measurement of physical capital: From theory to practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, varying the parameter A in a range that gives rise to capital accumulation levels typical of advanced countries 12 , and/or varying the annual rate of technological obsolescence in a range between 0.05 and 0.08 (see Escribá-Pérez et al. 2018 ), and/or considering productivity in the range (0.25, 0.35) the results remain very close to those illustrated below. Moreover, considering that agents in every cell have access to the same production technology and the same consumption good, it is natural to assume that also the environmental damage parameter and the defensive expenditure efficiency parameter remain constant in all the cells of the lattice ( , ), as well as the externalities they generate on neighboring cells ( , ).…”
Section: The Model With Local Interactionssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In any case, varying the parameter A in a range that gives rise to capital accumulation levels typical of advanced countries 12 , and/or varying the annual rate of technological obsolescence in a range between 0.05 and 0.08 (see Escribá-Pérez et al. 2018 ), and/or considering productivity in the range (0.25, 0.35) the results remain very close to those illustrated below. Moreover, considering that agents in every cell have access to the same production technology and the same consumption good, it is natural to assume that also the environmental damage parameter and the defensive expenditure efficiency parameter remain constant in all the cells of the lattice ( , ), as well as the externalities they generate on neighboring cells ( , ).…”
Section: The Model With Local Interactionssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…( 4 ) 0.33 Krueger ( 1999 ) and Gollin ( 2002 ) [0, 1] with See the description of the model [0, 1] with See the description of the model 0.7870898627 Escribá-Pérez et al. ( 2018 ) See main text (0, 1) See Eq. ( 1 ) …”
Section: The Model With Local Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Levy (1995) estimated an approximate 5 per cent depreciation rate for 'Nonresidential Business Structures' for the 1948-1991 period in the U.S. This rate is slightly lower than the statistic depreciation rate estimated for the Spanish economy by Escribá-Pérez et al (2017), which ranged between 5.8 and 7.5 per cent for the period 1965-2011. Finally, Bond et al (2003) assume an 8 per cent depreciation rate for the case of a sample of German, British, Belgian and French manufacturing firms.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The calculation of the capital depreciation rate is the main issue for measuring capital stock. At present, the main methods for calculating the depreciation rate include assuming the depreciation rate (Wu, 2000;Wang and Yao, 2003), estimating the depreciation rate by using the depreciation amount (Escribá-Pérez et al, 2018;Amir-ud-Din et al, 2019), econometric analysis (Hernández and Mauleón, 2005;Ning and Diewert, 2011) and the relative efficiency method (Zhang, 2008;Wu et al, 2014;Long and Herrera, 2016). However, the objectivity of assuming the depreciation rate method is poor, which can easily lead to "expected self-realization."…”
Section: Environmental Governance Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%