2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(00)00147-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic aspects of the control of classical swine fever outbreaks in the European Union

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Contagious diseases, such as classical swine fever and foot and mouth disease, can cause catastrophic losses to individual livestock producers, producers as a group, other stakeholders, as well as to taxpayers (Saatkamp et al 2000). The European Union is therefore prepared to eradicate most contagious diseases quickly once they are introduced into member countries.…”
Section: The Case Of Exogenously Delayed Slaughtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contagious diseases, such as classical swine fever and foot and mouth disease, can cause catastrophic losses to individual livestock producers, producers as a group, other stakeholders, as well as to taxpayers (Saatkamp et al 2000). The European Union is therefore prepared to eradicate most contagious diseases quickly once they are introduced into member countries.…”
Section: The Case Of Exogenously Delayed Slaughtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While eradication programmes based on "stamping-out" have been followed to eliminate classical swine fever (CSF) in many countries, these pig populations remain under constant threat, particularly where CSFV is enzootic in wild boars. With such situations, an important control instrument is vaccination, alone or combined with stamping-out [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, during the 1997/98 CSF outbreaks in Germany, Spain and the Netherlands, the pigs euthanized due to adverse animal welfare conditions comprised 62% to 87% of the total pigs euthanized (Edwards et al, 2000;Terpstra and de Smit, 2000). The costs associated with the activities for managing animal welfare concerns were estimated to be >50% of the total direct costs for the outbreak control (Saatkamp et al, 2000). In addition, the timing of the emergence of adverse animal welfare outcomes is critical because the resources required for alleviating animal welfare conditions often overlap with the resources for other disease control activities such as depopulation of infected premises, preemptive culling and carcass disposal Roche et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%