2019
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic assessment and carbon footprint of recycling rare earths from magnets: Evaluation at lab scale paving the way toward industrialization

Abstract: Project EXTRADE developed an innovative process for recycling rare earths (RE) from permanent magnets used in small applications. To assess the potential of further research from lab scale toward industrialization, this study performs economic and environmental evaluations. Because data are incomplete at current levels of process development, this study propagates uncertainty into the results. Results show that the EXTRADE process, as a complement to the Hard Disk Drive (HDD) waste management system currently … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis highlights the challenges with implementing improvements as well as the tradeoffs associated with these technologies in that several environmental impacts are improved, however, for other metrics the impacts will be higher than the current technologies. Last, a paper titled “Economic assessment and carbon footprint of recycling rare‐earths from magnets: Evaluation at lab scale paving the way towards industrialization” presents a case study in moving a process from lab‐scale to commercialization with the purpose of informing research prioritization (Beylot et al., ). This study focuses on using information available at an early stage of development and the propagation of uncertainty of the available data, as well as the impact on the economic and environmental assessment results.…”
Section: Assessing Technologies For Novel Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis highlights the challenges with implementing improvements as well as the tradeoffs associated with these technologies in that several environmental impacts are improved, however, for other metrics the impacts will be higher than the current technologies. Last, a paper titled “Economic assessment and carbon footprint of recycling rare‐earths from magnets: Evaluation at lab scale paving the way towards industrialization” presents a case study in moving a process from lab‐scale to commercialization with the purpose of informing research prioritization (Beylot et al., ). This study focuses on using information available at an early stage of development and the propagation of uncertainty of the available data, as well as the impact on the economic and environmental assessment results.…”
Section: Assessing Technologies For Novel Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28−30 Early stage evaluation of a technology's economic and environmental impacts could avoid unnecessary investment and guide the technology development during scale-up and commercialization. 31 Therefore, techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) are vital for the emerging waste plastic recycling and upcycling. 32 For instance, Singh et al illustrated that the enzymatic recycling process of PET waste could produce recycled TPA with 69%−83% less greenhouse gas emissions but at a higher cost.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early stage evaluation of a technology’s economic and environmental impacts could avoid unnecessary investment and guide the technology development during scale-up and commercialization . Therefore, techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) are vital for the emerging waste plastic recycling and upcycling .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Material recovery and recycling – to achieve several effects, including reduction of materials passed to the next stages, as well as indirect saving of energy, water, other resources and footprints by virtue of substituting products and materials that usually take virgin resources. Such substitution has been preliminarily estimated to provide substantial benefits in terms of footprint reduction – see the example of rare-earth materials recycling ( Beylot et al., 2020 ). A search in Google Scholar on the keywords ≪ “waste recycling”, "product substitution", “footprint reduction” ≫, as of 30/08/2020 ( Google Scholar, 2020 ), produces many studies on product substitutions, but there is an apparent lack of quantitative studies that would relate the rate of recycling quantitatively to the reduction of footprints, energy expenditure and the economic performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%