2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.iac.2008.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Assessment of Different Modalities of Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this current system it is no surprise that patients ranked costs as the second or third most important concern regarding home therapy (Table 4) and that the most concerned patients werethose 35 years of age and older and those receiving their therapy in the community (Figures 1 and 3). Many reports out of Europe and the United States have indicated a cost savings or at least a breakeven budget for a self-infusion system (Ochs et al 1987;Sorensen et al 1987;Ryan et al 1988;Gardulf et al 1995b;Kobayashi et al 1990;Gaspar et al 1998;Högy et al 2005;Membe et al 2008). A recent Canadian cost assessment comparing home-to hospital-based treatment revealed some marginal cost savings for home-based IVIG or SCIG replacement (Membe et al 2008).…”
Section: Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With this current system it is no surprise that patients ranked costs as the second or third most important concern regarding home therapy (Table 4) and that the most concerned patients werethose 35 years of age and older and those receiving their therapy in the community (Figures 1 and 3). Many reports out of Europe and the United States have indicated a cost savings or at least a breakeven budget for a self-infusion system (Ochs et al 1987;Sorensen et al 1987;Ryan et al 1988;Gardulf et al 1995b;Kobayashi et al 1990;Gaspar et al 1998;Högy et al 2005;Membe et al 2008). A recent Canadian cost assessment comparing home-to hospital-based treatment revealed some marginal cost savings for home-based IVIG or SCIG replacement (Membe et al 2008).…”
Section: Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many reports out of Europe and the United States have indicated a cost savings or at least a breakeven budget for a self-infusion system (Ochs et al 1987;Sorensen et al 1987;Ryan et al 1988;Gardulf et al 1995b;Kobayashi et al 1990;Gaspar et al 1998;Högy et al 2005;Membe et al 2008). A recent Canadian cost assessment comparing home-to hospital-based treatment revealed some marginal cost savings for home-based IVIG or SCIG replacement (Membe et al 2008). However, it remains uncertain whether costs for home-based treatment will be fully recovered from the government-owned insurer.…”
Section: Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually a 4 -6 session training course is required for home-based infusion preparation by the patients or their family. Medical and nursing follow-up care and support is offered during training (13). SCIg requires a nurse for patient training (6 hours during the first year) and for annual follow-up (6 hours).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intravenous route allows larger immunoglobulin doses to be administered, enables a fast onset of action, and has been demonstrated to be safe, effective, and well-tolerated [3]. However, adverse events may occur, administration in patients with poor venous access is difficult, and the cost of intravenous infusion is high [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%