Economic assessment of novel amine based CO2 capture technologies integrated in power plants based on European Benchmarking Task Force methodology

Manzolini, Giampaolo; Fernández, Eva Sánchez; Rezvani, Sina; Macchi, Ennio; Goetheer, Earl; Vlugt, Thijs J. H.

doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.066

Cited by 104 publications

(51 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although several models of the intensified amine scrubbing equipment have been recently published [11][12][13], neither the whole system nor impact of its integration on power plant performance has been analysed. Furthermore, solvent substitution has been identified as a viable measure to reduce the energy intensity of the PCC plants [14,15]. Goto et al [8] reviewed the impact of integration of the PCC plant for a number of alternative chemical solvents, and revealed that the efficiency penalty can be reduced to 8.0-8.5% points with NH 3 [16,17] and to 8.5% points with amine-blends, such as methyldiethanolamine/piperazine [18].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Efficiency improvements for the coal-fired power plant retrofit with CO 2 capture plant using chilled ammonia process

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Efficiency improvements for the coal-fired power plant retrofit with CO 2 capture plant using chilled ammonia process

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…To minimize loss of efficiency the search of other less energy-demand separation methods is important. All over the world intensive studies on sorbents allowing for the capture of CO 2 for less heat demand for the desorption process are carried out [43][44][45]. A separation method that is uniquely predisposed for cooperation with CHP plants is the membrane separation method because of the lack of the requirement to supply heat [46][47][48][49].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An analysis of the investment risk related to the integration of a supercritical coal-fired combined heat and power plant with an absorption installation for CO 2 separation

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…For the sake of consistency with other European studies, such as [8], the recommendations stated by the European Benchmarking Task Force [9] are adopted: high quality Douglas Premium coal with a LHV (lower heater value ) of 25.2 MJ/kg is considered and ISO conditions for an inland construction are applied for ambient pressure (1.013 bar), temperature (15 C) and relative humidity (60%). The net plant output of the considered plant is 975 MW e .…”

Section: Reference Air-fired Power Plantmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficiency evaluation procedure of coal-fired power plants with CO2 capture, cogeneration and hybridization

Hagi

Neveux²,

Moullec³

2015

Energy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

a b s t r a c tIn an energy landscape undergoing great change with regard to CO 2 emissions, the evaluation of solutions allowing a drastic reduction of the anthropogenic emissions are carried out for more than a decade. Among them, CO 2 capture and storage on coal power plants has been identified as a particularly promising solution but other options such as heat and electricity cogeneration and power plant hybridization with solar of biomass can also reduce the carbon footprint of electricity production. However, the implementation of an external process on a power plant impacts its electric production. Post-and oxy-combustion CO 2 capture, cogeneration for industries or districts, or hybridization are all examples of processes either demanding thermal and electrical energy or providing heat valorization opportunities. To identify the true potential of those systems, the evaluation of the performance of the integrated system is necessary. Also, to compare different solutions, a common framework has to be adopted since the performance of those systems are often highly dependent of the considered hypotheses.This paper presents a full integration procedure suited for both new built and retrofit coal-fired power plants by means of easy-to-use correlations, which links heat demand to production loss and waste heat availability to production increase, taking their exergy content into account. This correlative approach provides an analytical tool allowing a quick and realistic evaluation of a given concept or process layout, without the need of a detailed full power plant model. Examples are given for CO 2 capture, cogeneration and hybridization, illustrating the interest of the approach to evaluate and compare several technologies on a consistent manner. An Excel spreadsheet with the calculation procedure is available online (see supporting information).

show abstract

Economic assessment of novel amine based CO2 capture technologies integrated in power plants based on European Benchmarking Task Force methodology

Cited by 104 publications

References 36 publications

Efficiency improvements for the coal-fired power plant retrofit with CO 2 capture plant using chilled ammonia process

Efficiency improvements for the coal-fired power plant retrofit with CO 2 capture plant using chilled ammonia process

An analysis of the investment risk related to the integration of a supercritical coal-fired combined heat and power plant with an absorption installation for CO 2 separation

Efficiency evaluation procedure of coal-fired power plants with CO2 capture, cogeneration and hybridization

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About