2019
DOI: 10.1080/10875549.2019.1668899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Benefit of Agricultural Technology on Teff and Maize Crops in Ethiopia: The Blinder-Oaxaca Decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Ethiopian context, despite policy reforms to promote gender equality (Drucza et al, 2019; Kumar & Quisumbing, 2015), notable gender gaps remain in access to higher education (Kassie, 2018; Mjaaland, 2018; Semela et al, 2020), access to agricultural extension service and agricultural productivity (Aguilar et al, 2015; Gebre et al, 2019a; Melesse & Awel, 2020; Ragasa et al, 2013), access to and control over land (Asmare, 2016; Desta, 2019; Kumar & Quisumbing, 2012; Kumar & Quisumbing, 2015), agricultural technology adoption (Gebre et al, 2019b; Shita et al, 2020) and market participation (Holden et al, 2011; Lenjiso et al, 2016; Marenya et al, 2017). In addition to this, existing time allocations within the household make women more time‐poor (Arora, 2015).…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Empirical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the Ethiopian context, despite policy reforms to promote gender equality (Drucza et al, 2019; Kumar & Quisumbing, 2015), notable gender gaps remain in access to higher education (Kassie, 2018; Mjaaland, 2018; Semela et al, 2020), access to agricultural extension service and agricultural productivity (Aguilar et al, 2015; Gebre et al, 2019a; Melesse & Awel, 2020; Ragasa et al, 2013), access to and control over land (Asmare, 2016; Desta, 2019; Kumar & Quisumbing, 2012; Kumar & Quisumbing, 2015), agricultural technology adoption (Gebre et al, 2019b; Shita et al, 2020) and market participation (Holden et al, 2011; Lenjiso et al, 2016; Marenya et al, 2017). In addition to this, existing time allocations within the household make women more time‐poor (Arora, 2015).…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Empirical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conceptual framework of this study draws from several studies on gender and climate change adaptation in Africa (Arora, 2015;Bekana, 2020;Kassie, 2018;Mersha & van Laerhoven, 2016;Mersha & van Laerhoven, 2018Ngigi et al, 2017;Tsige et al, 2019) and in other developing countries Aryal, Sapkota, et al, 2019;Bhattarai et al, 2015;Carr & Thompson, 2014;Eastin, 2018;Goli et al, 2020;Partey et al, 2020;Theis et al, 2018). As summarized in Figure 2 In the Ethiopian context, despite policy reforms to promote gender equality (Drucza et al, 2019;Kumar & Quisumbing, 2015), notable gender gaps remain in access to higher education (Kassie, 2018;Mjaaland, 2018;Semela et al, 2020), access to agricultural extension service and agricultural productivity (Aguilar et al, 2015;Gebre et al, 2019a;Melesse & Awel, 2020;Ragasa et al, 2013), access to and control over land (Asmare, 2016;Desta, 2019;Kumar & Quisumbing, 2012;Kumar & Quisumbing, 2015), agricultural technology adoption (Gebre et al, 2019b;Shita et al, 2020) and market participation (Holden et al, 2011;Lenjiso et al, 2016;Marenya et al, 2017). In addition to this, existing time allocations within the household make women more time-poor (Arora, 2015).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The other research by Mensah et al (2021) said that the use of certified seeds in maize farming provides a higher income than seeds developed by farmers themselves. Besides that, Shita, Kumar, and Singh (2020) in their research also said that farmers who adopt technology, both in the form of fertilizer technology and fertilizer technology along with improved seeds, both increase their profits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, it is important to note that the FFS approach unlocks an opening for smallholder farmers to take up and appraise obtainable but viable technologies for utilising available land and acquaint themselves with fresh know-hows through comparison of their orthodox technologies with their individual customs and values. In particular, increased extension services increased convenience to credit and guaranteed appropriate obtainability of technologies at a reasonable amount (Shita, Kumar & Singh, 2020). This way, FFS are perceived to be a great advantage that can facilitate farmers to think outside the box rather than being forced by government authorities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%