2019
DOI: 10.1080/21556660.2019.1658306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic burden of hemophilia B in the US: a systematic literature review

Abstract: Background: Hemophilia B (HB) is a rare disease caused by congenital Factor IX (FIX) deficiency. HB requires life-long management to prevent or manage bleeding and associated morbidity. Although HB affects only a small portion of the population, it is associated with high overall cost and imposes a significant financial burden on individuals, payers, and society in general. Due to variation in patient clinical characteristics and treatment choice, cost and healthcare resource utilization associated with diseas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Haemophilia B and its treatment also bear a notable economic burden on patients and society [ 14 17 ]. The original CHESS study (known as CHESS I, “Cost of Haemophilia in Europe: a Socioeconomic Survey”) reported significant costs associated with severe haemophilia and its treatment, including reduced employment and lost wages among patients and their caregivers in Europe [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haemophilia B and its treatment also bear a notable economic burden on patients and society [ 14 17 ]. The original CHESS study (known as CHESS I, “Cost of Haemophilia in Europe: a Socioeconomic Survey”) reported significant costs associated with severe haemophilia and its treatment, including reduced employment and lost wages among patients and their caregivers in Europe [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of the nonclinical burden of hemophilia B often focus on the cost of FIX prophylaxis, which accounts for the majority of direct costs, as analyzed in a recent analysis of administrative claims and a systematic literature review [ 26 , 28 ]. Few recent studies have examined indirect costs and non-medical direct costs, which comprise a smaller proportion of total costs but impose a considerable burden on patients, their caregivers, and society [ 27 , 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%