2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00161.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Burden of Osteoporosis-Related Fractures in Medicaid

Abstract: The economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures on state Medicaid budgets is substantial.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
38
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
38
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in an unadjusted matching analysis, the prefracture costs were 16-17 % of the incident costs [8]. When both the cases and controls are required to have osteoporosis, effectively matching for a greater level of comorbidity, the cost in the pre-fracture period is 31 % of the post fracture period and 41 % in a concurrent control group [11]. When the matching includes employment status, the cost in the controls is 40 % of the incident fracture cases [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, in an unadjusted matching analysis, the prefracture costs were 16-17 % of the incident costs [8]. When both the cases and controls are required to have osteoporosis, effectively matching for a greater level of comorbidity, the cost in the pre-fracture period is 31 % of the post fracture period and 41 % in a concurrent control group [11]. When the matching includes employment status, the cost in the controls is 40 % of the incident fracture cases [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some studies have estimated the excess cost of fractures in cases with fracture and osteoporosis to matched controls with osteoporosis without fracture [9][10][11]. A key difference in this method from a pre-post design is that the excess costs are focussed on the patient and not the clinical event which may reduce attribution bias [3,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with existing NV fracture studies [7,8,10,19,23,28], specific NV fracture types included are femur, forearm (i.e., hand, radius, ulna, and wrist), hip, lower leg (i.e., ankle, fibula, foot, patella, and tibia), pelvis, ribs, upper arm (i.e., clavicle, humerus, and scapula), and multiple sites. In addition, the study provides insight into the characteristics of patients suffering from subsequent fractures through a descriptive assessment of comorbid conditions, health care resource use, and health care costs during the year following an incident fracture for subsequent fracture patients relative to those of NV fracture patients without subsequent fractures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Additionally, although there is a substantial literature describing the rates of comorbidities and health care resource use as well as their associated costs for fracture patients as a whole [7][8][9][10][23][24][25][26], there is little detail on the characteristics, health outcomes, and economic burden of the subgroup of NV fracture patients who incur subsequent fractures. These patients are likely to be more severely ill and to place a greater cost burden on private and public insurers [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation