Economic competitiveness vs. green competitiveness of agriculture in the European Union countries

Abstract

Research background: Many scientists have researched the economic competitiveness of agriculture. At the same time, considerably less attention is paid to the so-called green competitiveness. Considering a global trend searching for solutions to reduce the environmental impact of the agricultural sector, it seems reasonable to explore the overlap between economic competitiveness and green competitiveness. Purpose of the article: This study aims to answer the following questions: What is the level of economic and green competitiveness of agriculture in respective countries? What is the level of the comprehensive competitiveness of agriculture in EU member states? Do the economic competitiveness outcomes of respective countries coincide with their green competitiveness rankings? Methods: Taxonomic methods were applied to design synthetic indices of economic, green and comprehensive competitiveness of 27 member states of the European Union, based on multi-criteria sets of specific indicators from 2018. Findings & value added: The results of analyses imply that, in general, the level of green competitiveness of agriculture is higher than the level of its economic competitiveness in EU member states. Simultaneously, the developed rankings show that respective countries' economic and green competitiveness are not linked. In other words, economic competitiveness outcomes do not match green competitiveness outcomes for EU agriculture. This work is a genuine contribution to studies on the methods for measuring and evaluating the competitiveness of agriculture as it designs separate synthetic measures for economic and green competitiveness and confronts both types of competitiveness in EU member states. The research findings for the first time provide clear answers to questions about the mutual relationship between economic and green competitiveness in agriculture. Furthermore, an added value of this study is that it introduces and attempts to define the notion of green competitiveness.

Charging Stations and Electromobility Development: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis

“…The main research of this study is that Industry 4.0 creates the space for the electromobility development [118,119]. The conditions of the modern economy are privileged by innovative organizations, using the latest technologies, which are under the Industry 4.0 influence.…”

The Impacts of Climate Change, Carbon Dioxide Emissions (CO2) and Renewable Energy Consumption on Agricultural Economic Growth in South Africa: ARDL Approach

“…In the South African context, where prime land is in the hands of the few, continuous negative welfare will weaken social cohesion. In the context of climate change, it will be important for the agricultural sector to pay attention not only to economic competitiveness but also to green competitiveness as this has a bearing on the sustainability and economic growth of the sector [66].…”

The Dual Effects of Environmental Regulation and Financial Support for Agriculture on Agricultural Green Development: Spatial Spillover Effects and Spatio-Temporal Heterogeneity

“…Relevant studies at home and abroad on the spatial spillover relationship between financial support for agriculture and agricultural green development have explored the two aspects. On the one hand, local financial support for agriculture could promote the agglomeration of information, technology and talents in the local region, which is conducive to the information exchange and knowledge spillover of the agricultural environment in the local region, as well as the diffusion of technology and knowledge in adjacent regions, promoting agricultural green development in both local and adjacent regions [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Additionally, with subsidies for delayed fertilization control, soil testing and formula fertilization, and R&D of energy-saving and environmental protection machinery technology, agricultural carbon emissions could be reduced, as well as the adjacent regions due to technology spillovers [22].…”

“…Additionally, with subsidies for delayed fertilization control, soil testing and formula fertilization, and R&D of energy-saving and environmental protection machinery technology, agricultural carbon emissions could be reduced, as well as the adjacent regions due to technology spillovers [22]. On the other hand, financial support for agriculture could promote competition in agricultural development industries between local and adjacent regions, which would increase agricultural carbon emission and inhibit agricultural green development by a high input of energy, fertilizers, pesticides, untreated agricultural wastewater containing nitrogen and phosphorus and other agricultural materials [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Furthermore, one region would gather more agricultural production resources which may have a siphoning effect on the adjacent regions, suppressing the adjacent regions' level of agricultural green development [23].…”

“…Sci. 2022, 12, 11609 2 of 20 the local government would provide a series of subsidies and incentives to local agricultural operators for emission reduction and technological innovation [5,6]. It will promote the generation of new technologies for agricultural green development; accordingly, the level of agricultural green development in adjacent regions would also be promoted with knowledge diffusion and technology spillover [7,8].…”