2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3340913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Complexity and Gender Inequality in Education: An Empirical Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in public expenditure on education would thus contribute to reducing gender inequality in education. A result that is close to that found by Ben Saâd and Assoumou‐Ella (2019) confirms our basic hypothesis. This result challenges more than ever the role of governments to fight against gender inequality in education.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase in public expenditure on education would thus contribute to reducing gender inequality in education. A result that is close to that found by Ben Saâd and Assoumou‐Ella (2019) confirms our basic hypothesis. This result challenges more than ever the role of governments to fight against gender inequality in education.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In this sense, Ben Saâd and Assoumou‐Ella (2019) analyse the effect of economic complexity on the gender parity index in education over the period 1984–2014. Using the generalised method of moments (GMM) developed by Blundell and Bond (1988), the authors find that economic complexity has a positive impact on the parity index at the primary and secondary levels when controlling for the global sample.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking a general view, recent studies (Le Caous and Huarng 2020) agree that economic complexity is positively associated with human capital. Ben Saâd and Assoumou‐Ella (2019) provided an interesting finding that economic complexity increased gender equality in education at primary and secondary level, while it increased gender inequality in education at tertiary level in MENA countries. These findings imply that increases in economic complexity might be good for increasing gender equality for unskilled or low‐skilled women workers (i.e., primary and secondary educational level), while it may be a harmful factor for women workers with high skills (i.e., tertiary educational level).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, countries with low levels of economic complexity should consider policies to support low earners, such as raising the minimum wage. More importantly, government expenditure in education for unskilled or low‐skilled workers (who are mostly also low earners) needs to be carried out to fight income inequality (Ben Saâd & Assoumou‐Ella 2019; Lee & Lee 2018). In addition, some special regions such as MENA and SA should be prepared for a rise in income inequality in coming decades when their economic complexity reaches a certain level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other human-related factors, e.g. human development, sustainability (Le Caous and Huarng, 2020), gender parity (Le Caous and Huarng, 2020; Ben Saâd and Assoumou-Ella, 2019) and countries' health outcomes (Vu, 2020), are positively affected by EC.…”
Section: Papers Classification Based On Their Contributions To the Li...mentioning
confidence: 99%