2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11079-017-9466-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Costs and Benefits of EMU Membership from the Perspective of a Non-member

Abstract: The result of the decision whether to join the European Monetary Union, an irreversible policy choice for several European Union members, presents potentially significant costs and benefits. With a focus on the largest EU economy outside of the euro, Sweden, this paper applies the novel synthetic control method of estimation to evaluate whether there are costs or benefits associated with EMU membership in terms of various aspects of economic performance and how these have developed from 1999 to 2015. Findings … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several short policy-makers implications have to be made based on our research findings. First, as several scholars indicate non-member countries of EMU have to carefully prepared if they intend to adopt euro, taking into account all costs and benefits of membership in monetary union (Mazier & Petit, 2013;Gyoerk, 2017;Pechova, 2012). Second, nowadays euro-zone perspective is less attractive then before recent crisis, so structural refroms has to be done to avoid recent troubles (Afonso et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several short policy-makers implications have to be made based on our research findings. First, as several scholars indicate non-member countries of EMU have to carefully prepared if they intend to adopt euro, taking into account all costs and benefits of membership in monetary union (Mazier & Petit, 2013;Gyoerk, 2017;Pechova, 2012). Second, nowadays euro-zone perspective is less attractive then before recent crisis, so structural refroms has to be done to avoid recent troubles (Afonso et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally proposed by Abadie and Gardeazabal (2003), in essence SCM is based on the idea that a combination of unaffected observable unitsfor instance, data from countries where policy changes do not take placewill provide a more appropriate comparison than any single unaffected unit by itself. Abadie (2019) provides more detail on SCM; one recent application of this approach is Gyoerk (2017), who examines whether Sweden would have benefited from membership of the single European currency. While there are parallels between SCM and linear regression analysis, there are also some important differences, as set out and examined by Doudchenko and Imbens (2017).…”
Section: Synthetic Control Methods (Scm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Covariates for the mentioned macroeconomic indicators were selected according to theoretical assumptions. The determinants of growth and aggregate demand components have been extensively researched in the literature, so this paper uses variables such as trade openness, population growth, share of investment in GDP, share of educated inhabitants as an approximator of human capital (more detailed explanation can be found at: Henreksen, Torstensson and Torstensson, 1997;Gyoerk, 2017). To determine the income and savings rate, additional variables of unemployment rate, GDP growth, dependency ratio were selected (see: Nicolescu-Aron and Mihăescu, 2012; Rocher and Stierle, 2015; Furceri and Ostry, 2019).…”
Section: Data and Samplementioning
confidence: 99%