2009
DOI: 10.1515/eqc.2009.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Design of Moving Average Control Chart for Continued and Ceased Production Process

Abstract: In this article following the approach of Lorenzen and Vance, an economic design of moving average control chart is developed for ceased as well for continued production during control actions. The performance of the control charts is compared for the two production modes by means of the loss cost per time unit. The ceased production mode yields about 30% saving in the loss cost when compared to that of the continued production. The example given provides some insight to the sensitivity of the model. Brought t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we put δ 1 = δ 2 = 1, the cost function represents loss cost function for continuous process, whereas if we put δ 1 = δ 2 = 0, it represents loss cost function for ceased process. If we put δ 1 = 1, δ 2 = 0, the function represents loss cost function for (1-0) semi-ceased process, where the process is continued during the search of an assignable cause and ceased during repair of the cause, if occurred (Patil and Rattihalli, 2009). The cost function developed is a complicated function of three design parameters (n, h, k), hence to get desired values of parameters and the expected loss, we use algorithmic procedure instead of direct derivative method.…”
Section: Expected Loss Cost Function During the Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If we put δ 1 = δ 2 = 1, the cost function represents loss cost function for continuous process, whereas if we put δ 1 = δ 2 = 0, it represents loss cost function for ceased process. If we put δ 1 = 1, δ 2 = 0, the function represents loss cost function for (1-0) semi-ceased process, where the process is continued during the search of an assignable cause and ceased during repair of the cause, if occurred (Patil and Rattihalli, 2009). The cost function developed is a complicated function of three design parameters (n, h, k), hence to get desired values of parameters and the expected loss, we use algorithmic procedure instead of direct derivative method.…”
Section: Expected Loss Cost Function During the Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate the comparison between the normal and non-normal process as well between continued and ceased process, here we consider the example by Koo and Case (1990), which is used by Patil and Rattihalli (2009) with some modifications and also by Yu and Chen (2005). Following are the values of input parameters selected.…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we put δ 1 = δ 2 = 1, the cost function represents loss cost function for continuous process and if we put δ 1 = δ 2 = 0, it represents loss cost function for ceased process. If we use δ 1 = 1, δ 2 = 0, the function represents loss cost function for (1-0) semi-ceased process, where the process is continued during the search of an assignable cause and ceased during repair of the cause, if occurred (Patil and Rattihalli [17]). …”
Section: Expected Loss Cost Function During the Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen and Yang [7] have obtained economic design for moving average control charts under continuous flow process. Patil and Rattihalli [17] have developed economic design of MA control chart which works simultaneously for both continued and ceased processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%