Economic Development and the Effectiveness of Foreign Aid: A Historical Perspective

Abstract

Summary In this paper I discuss the effectiveness of foreign aid from a historical perspective. I show that foreign aid is a relatively new concept in economics, and I emphasize the role of exchange rate policies in the foreign aid controversies of the 1970s through 1990s. I show that in the early 1980s there were major changes in views regarding aid and agriculture. I emphasize the role of “ownership” of aid programs by the recipient countries as a way of increasing effectiveness. I argue that there is little hope of making progress in these debates if the economics profession continues to rely, almost exclusively, on cross section regressions. In order to move forward, these analyses need to be supplemented by in depth case studies that follow a country's history for many decades.

Navigating Economic Development in Palestine: Analysis of Key Challenges

“…The direction of foreign aid within the economy also shapes its impact, whether aimed at investments, capital projects, or balance of payments support. This is in line with the empirical evidence arguing that developing countries shall decide on the allocation of aid received in order to increase its effectiveness in achieving economic development [29].…”

The impact of foreign aid on economic development: A systematic literature review and content analysis of the top 50 most influential papers

“…The majority of studies assess foreign aid's impact on developing countries as a whole or a group of countries based on income level or geographical location. However, some scholars argue that the impact of aid is likely to be recipient specific, thus affirming the importance of country-specific impacts (Bourguignon Francois, 2007;Edwards, 2015).…”

Moderating Effect of Institutional Quality on Relationship Between Foreign Aid and Economic Growth in Africa

“…Put differently, why are richer and more advanced countries in Europe, America and Asia recording better economic performance than African economies, contrary to the postulations of the convergent hypothesis distilled from the Solow model? The model predicted that poor countries would grow relatively faster than rich ones as the rate of return on capital is higher in poor countries, and thus, in the long run, both poor and rich countries would converge at their balance growth path (Edwards, 2015). The fascinating implication of this hypothesis is that poverty should disappear by itself in the long run, so that one would expect the poor countries in Africa to catch up with the rich and more advanced countries in Europe, America and Asia since a country's relative position on the world development ladder is not immutable (Romer, 2012).…”