2016
DOI: 10.18488/journal.aefr/2016.6.12/102.12.719.728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Development, Women Empowerment and U Shaped Labour Force Function : Time Series Evidence for Bangladesh

Abstract: Contribution/ OriginalityThe contribution of this paper is to find the Quadratic U shaped labor supply function for women of Bangladesh Economy over the period 1991-2012. Women are mostly economically active in the manufacturing sector, along with service and agricultural sectors. This paper estimates the level of per capita GDP beyond which the U Curve bends upward. Time series evidence adheres to the notion that female labor force participation expedites Economic growth of Bangladesh.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Disaggregating 28 European Union (EU) member countries into two samples of old and new members, Altuzarra et al (2019) confirm the U-shaped female labor force function for the whole sample and 13 new-member samples not for the 15 old-members sample. The U-shaped feminization hypothesis has earlier been affirmed by Altarawneh (2018), Husain (2016), and Muhajid (2013) for Jordan, Bangladesh and Pakistan, respectively. It has also been corroborated in panel studies including Lechman and Kaur (2015), Olivetti (2013) and Tam (2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Disaggregating 28 European Union (EU) member countries into two samples of old and new members, Altuzarra et al (2019) confirm the U-shaped female labor force function for the whole sample and 13 new-member samples not for the 15 old-members sample. The U-shaped feminization hypothesis has earlier been affirmed by Altarawneh (2018), Husain (2016), and Muhajid (2013) for Jordan, Bangladesh and Pakistan, respectively. It has also been corroborated in panel studies including Lechman and Kaur (2015), Olivetti (2013) and Tam (2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…While these studies investigated the nexuses between female economic participation and other macroeconomic variables such as ICT, financial access, and globalization in the SSA region, the current study examines the role of female economic participation in the region's growth trajectory. Gender-specific disparities in terms of economic participation bear high economic cost not only for women but also for the economies as a whole as it lowers growth performance, thereby reducing overall welfare (Chakravarty et al 2017;IMF, 2013;2016). It may also restrict the talent population of a nation's labor force as less qualified men may push potential highly qualified women out of the job market, thereby endangering the economy's international competitiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More chances are present for women in the economic development in terms of education sector; therefore, women have started achieving higher levels in such sectors in the form of white collar jobs. This led to enhanced female participation in the labour force (Husain, 2016). Moreover, Goldin (1995) has revealed a declined part of U-shaped i.e.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the initial stage of economic development, the development in male education as compared to female dominates the substitution effect. However, substitution effect becomes stronger than the income effect among women with greater and broader access to education (Husain, 2016). Tinsel (2001) has asserted that urbanization and unemployment affected the economic growth and female labour force participation.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participation has steadily declined in India since the early 1980s, while remaining low and stagnant in Pakistan, the Middle East, and North Africa (Ejaz, 2007;Lahoti & Swaminathan, 2016;Verme, Barry, & Guennouni, 2016). In contrast, participation has steadily risen in Bangladesh (Husain, 2016), South Korea (Lee, Jang, & Sarkar, 2008), Sri Lanka (LFS, 2017) and Taiwan (Cheng & Loichinger, 2017). In Latin America, too, participation has increased, but remains low in Chile, Mexico and Nicaragua (Contreras & Plaza, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%