2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic estimates of invasive wild pig damage to crops in 12 US states

Abstract: We report the results of a survey on invasive wild pig (Sus scrofa L.) damage and control in 12 US states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, these regions are the stronghold of the wild pig population in the USA, 18,39 which are known to cause severe damage to agricultural crops. 40,41 Based on ground-based surveys of corn and peanut fields in South Carolina, the extent of forested and wetland areas surrounding crop fields was found to be the most important attributes positively associated with wild pig damage, whereas the amount of adjacent agricultural area and paved roads were associated negatively. 42 Future research should investigate the link between wildlife damage and wild pig presence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, these regions are the stronghold of the wild pig population in the USA, 18,39 which are known to cause severe damage to agricultural crops. 40,41 Based on ground-based surveys of corn and peanut fields in South Carolina, the extent of forested and wetland areas surrounding crop fields was found to be the most important attributes positively associated with wild pig damage, whereas the amount of adjacent agricultural area and paved roads were associated negatively. 42 Future research should investigate the link between wildlife damage and wild pig presence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, rural areas in these regions is interspersed with high quality wildlife habitat 35 , whereas agriculture dominates the landscape in other regions like the Midwest corn belt. Interestingly, these regions are the stronghold of the wild pig population in the USA, 18,39 which are known to cause severe damage to agricultural crops 40,41 . Based on ground‐based surveys of corn and peanut fields in South Carolina, the extent of forested and wetland areas surrounding crop fields was found to be the most important attributes positively associated with wild pig damage, whereas the amount of adjacent agricultural area and paved roads were associated negatively 42 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several biotic (Firake et al, 2016;McKee et al, 2020;Rojas et al, 2016; and abiotic (Bybordi and Tabatabaei, 2009;Wijewardana et al, 2019) factors may lead to a poor quality of crop establishment (Figure 2). This has several direct (e.g.…”
Section: The Crop Establishment Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crop establishment is affected by five major groups of drivers and their interactions namely seed and seedling characteristics, seedbed components (physical, chemical and biological), weather, cropping systems (Lamichhane et al, 2018), and animal pests coming from outside the seedbed (Lamichhane et al, 2020b). The latter have been increasingly reported to cause post-emergence damage of field crops (Dimitri et al, 2012;Firake et al, 2016;Lamichhane, 2021;McKee et al, 2020;Nasu and Matsuda, 1976). A successful management of animal pests affecting crop establishment requires a systems-level approach that combines a range of disciplines including Agronomy, Biology and Ecology.…”
Section: The Crop Establishment Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, these studies did not focus on evaluating post-emergence seedling losses due to biotic stresses in general and those due to vertebrate pests in particular, which were frequently observed across the experimental sites. Post-emergence seedling losses due to vertebrate pests represent an important problem for many field crops, leading to severe economic losses across the globe ( Firake, Behere & Chandra, 2016 ; Giunchi et al., 2012 ; McKee et al., 2020 ; Nasu & Matsuda, 1976 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%