2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic evaluation of grid-connected micro-grid system with photovoltaic and energy storage under different investment and financing models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The profitability of ESS is verified only in eight case studies. This assumption is confirmed by the literature analysis [24,25], which confirms that the subsidies play a key-role in the feasibility of PV-integrated battery systems. The economic opportunities in this scenario are verified only when are verified three conditions: (i) a battery size double than PV plant capacity; (ii) a lifetime of ESS equal to 8 years; and, (iii) a substantial increase of the share of self-consumption.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysissupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The profitability of ESS is verified only in eight case studies. This assumption is confirmed by the literature analysis [24,25], which confirms that the subsidies play a key-role in the feasibility of PV-integrated battery systems. The economic opportunities in this scenario are verified only when are verified three conditions: (i) a battery size double than PV plant capacity; (ii) a lifetime of ESS equal to 8 years; and, (iii) a substantial increase of the share of self-consumption.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysissupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Therefore, many different optimization models have been proposed for determining the cost optimal investment decisions and operation of building supply systems: either as Linear Programs (LP) [31,32] with the advantage of good computational tractability but the disadvantage of not being able to account for economies of scale; or as a Mixed Integer Linear Program (MILP) model [33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Furthermore, two-level approaches that determine at least a part of investment decisions with a meta-heuristic solver and operation with a simulation or optimization are popular [40][41][42][43][44][45]. The last approach can account for very detailed physical models but no global optimal solution is guaranteed.…”
Section: Building Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where NPV max is the maximum NPV of the PV or PV‐BES system; B L,j , B G,j , and B S,j are the benefits from reducing the grid electricity fee, selling electricity to the grid ,and PV subsidies for the j ‐th year, respectively; C I,total are the total initial investment costs; C R(B),j’ and C R(inv),j” are the replacement costs of the battery and inverter for the j’ ‐th and j” ‐th years, respectively; and C OM,j and C E,j are the operational and maintenance cost and the cost of purchasing electricity from the grid for the j ‐th year, respectively. Although the NPV for a PV‐BES system will change with the PV size for a fixed ratio of PV size to BES size, there is a maximal NPV ( NPV max ) at a certain PV size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of net present value (NPV) is widely used in many papers, since the time dimension of the benefit and cost flows extends the lifespan of the project. [18][19][20] It is suitable for the PV-BES system because the social costs and benefits are considered in the overall life cycle. The equations for calculation of the NPV are as follows:…”
Section: Cost-benefit Models For a Pv-bes Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%