2009
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-3214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Evaluation of Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Preterm Infants Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation

Abstract: Despite its higher price relative to many other neonatal therapies, iNO in this trial was not associated with higher costs of care, an effect that is likely due to its impact on length of stay and ventilation. Indeed, for infants who receive nitric oxide between 7 and 14 days of life, the therapy seemed to lower costs while improving outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…8 A retrospective economic evaluation using patient-level data from the NOCLD trial (the only trial showing clinical benefit) reported that the overall mean cost per infant for the initial hospitalization was similar in the treated and placebo groups; however, when iNO therapy was initiated between 7 and 14 days of age, there was a 71% probability that the treatment decreased costs and improved outcomes. 45 Cost-benefit analysis from 2 other studies failed to show any costbenefit. 37,39 Among preterm infants in the Inhaled Nitric Oxide Versus Ventilatory Support Without Inhaled Nitric Oxide trial, there was no difference in resource use and cost of care through the 4-year assessment.…”
Section: Cost-benefit Analyses Of Routine Use Of Ino In Preterm Infantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 A retrospective economic evaluation using patient-level data from the NOCLD trial (the only trial showing clinical benefit) reported that the overall mean cost per infant for the initial hospitalization was similar in the treated and placebo groups; however, when iNO therapy was initiated between 7 and 14 days of age, there was a 71% probability that the treatment decreased costs and improved outcomes. 45 Cost-benefit analysis from 2 other studies failed to show any costbenefit. 37,39 Among preterm infants in the Inhaled Nitric Oxide Versus Ventilatory Support Without Inhaled Nitric Oxide trial, there was no difference in resource use and cost of care through the 4-year assessment.…”
Section: Cost-benefit Analyses Of Routine Use Of Ino In Preterm Infantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, such evaluations are uncommon in neonatology, constituting only 1% of RCTs in 1 systematic review. 47 When they have been performed, they have confirmed that expensive therapies may represent good Value, 28,48,49 and that economic outcomes might facilitate decision-making when clinical outcomes are equivalent. 50 To perform economic evaluation ancillary to RCTs or other clinical studies, additional data are necessary.…”
Section: Evidence-based Economicsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Existing guidelines provide a roadmap for investigators on how to perform such analyses. 20,51,52 When prospective economic evaluation alongside an RCT is infeasible, cost-effectiveness can be assessed in retrospective analyses of RCT data, 22,49,53 decision analysis by using RCT efficacy information, 54 or carefully performed observational investigations. 55 Similar concern for bias exists for economic evaluations as for efficacy outcome when there is a lack of randomization and an a priori hypothesis.…”
Section: Evidence-based Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact could reduce the feasibility of iNO in developing countries. However, other authors have recently evaluated a population of infants with a gestational age of less than 34 weeks, analyzing the length of hospitalization and ventilation, asserting that iNO is not associated with higher costs of care while improving outcomes [30], conflicting with the findings of the INNOVO study performed on a similar population [31]. The differences reported in published studies ( variables evaluated, making unfeasible any prediction concerning the real cost of the treatment.…”
Section: Nitric Oxyde (No)mentioning
confidence: 98%