Recreational Fisheries 2002
DOI: 10.1002/9780470995402.ch3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Evaluation of Recreational Fishery Policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The net economic value of angling in Alaska was estimated with US$285 per day (1997 dollars) (Duffield et al . 2002) and the consumer surplus of an angling trip in the Costa Rican billfish recreational fishery was estimated with US$1777 per trip (Rudd et al . 2002; see Pitcher and Hollingworth 2002 for more estimates).…”
Section: Description Of Inland Fisheries Of Developed Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The net economic value of angling in Alaska was estimated with US$285 per day (1997 dollars) (Duffield et al . 2002) and the consumer surplus of an angling trip in the Costa Rican billfish recreational fishery was estimated with US$1777 per trip (Rudd et al . 2002; see Pitcher and Hollingworth 2002 for more estimates).…”
Section: Description Of Inland Fisheries Of Developed Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In and near Yellowstone National Park (USA), anglers placed a value of between US$172 and 977 (2002 dollars) on a day of ¢shing (Kerkvliet et al 2002). The net economic value of angling in Alaska was estimated with US$285 per day (1997 dollars) (Du⁄eld et al 2002) and the consumer surplus of an angling trip in the Costa Rican bill¢sh recreational ¢shery was estimated with US$1777 per trip (Rudd et al 2002;see Pitcher and Hollingworth 2002 for more estimates). Lower WTP values were reported in other studies.…”
Section: Economic Bene¢tsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cost and earning surveys would be needed to quantify producer surplus for specific situations. For many fisheries, producer surplus may be near zero as fishing revenue just covers the variable costs of fishing (Rudd et al . 2002).…”
Section: Ecological Services and The Value Of Marine Reservesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the production side of the equation, effects of changes in animal sizes or abundance will likely change the behaviour and profitability of recreational service providers, and may increase producer surplus (see Rudd et al . 2002).…”
Section: Ecological Services and The Value Of Marine Reservesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation