Economic Evaluations of Preventive Interventions for Dental Caries and Periodontitis: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Objectives To critically examine the methods used for full economic evaluations of preventive interventions for dental caries and periodontitis. Methods Published literature post-2000 was searched to April 2021. Based on a developed intervention classification framework for dental caries and periodontitis, only universal, selective or indicated interventions were included in this review. The Drummond 10-point checklist was used for quality appraisal. Results Of 3,007 unique records screened for relevance, 73 studies were reviewed. Most model-based studies (61/73) used cost-effectiveness analysis (49%) or cost-benefit analysis (28%). Trial-based studies (16/73) commonly used cost-effectiveness analysis (59%). Four studies used both economic evaluation methods. Sixty-four papers (88%) were on dental caries, eight papers (11%) focused on periodontitis, and one paper (1%) included both oral diseases; 72% of model-based and 82% of trial-based studies were of good quality. The most frequently investigated dental caries preventive interventions were water fluoridation (universal intervention; cost-saving or cost-effective), fissure sealant and fluoride varnish (selective and indicated interventions; cost-effectiveness outcomes were inconsistent). Supportive periodontal therapy with oral health education (indicated intervention; cost-effective) was the most frequently evaluated preventive intervention for periodontitis. Thirty percent of studies with a time horizon > 1 year did not apply an appropriate discount rate and 26% did not comprehensively discuss other important considerations beyond the technical analysis. Conclusions Generic health outcome measures should be incorporated for economic evaluations on preventive interventions for dental caries and periodontitis, and an increased focus to prevent periodontitis using economic evaluation methods is needed to inform resource allocation and policy decision-making.

Rampant caries management using Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF): A case report

“…It is interesting to note that the occlusal surfaces of all first molars restored with fissure sealants were not carious, supporting the efficacy of sealant application for patients with high caries risk (Nguyen et al, 2023). The patient was seen again after 1 week, 1 month and 3 months for follow-up and presented with improved oral hygiene and all restorations were intact.…”

Modeled health economic and equity impact on dental caries and health outcomes from a 20% sugar sweetened beverages tax in Australia

“…The willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) threshold of AUD$50,000 per DALY averted was chosen. This value was used by two previous studies (Ciketic et al., 2010 ; Cobiac & Vos, 2012 ) identified by the systematic review on economic evaluations of prevention interventions for dental caries and periodontitis (Nguyen et al., 2022 ).…”

Economic evaluation of a community dental care model for people experiencing homelessness.

“…A main strength of this study is that it expands on the application of economic evaluation techniques less commonly used in oral health context such as periodontitis 40 and severe tooth loss. Furthermore, modelled economic evaluations in oral health have often used a tooth-level model rather than the person-level model approach used in this study.…”